Cited by 124

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combining bleach and mild predigestion improves ancient DNA recovery from bones

Boessenkool, Sanne, Hanghøj, Kristian, Nistelberger, Heidi M., Der Sarkissian, Clio, Gondek, Agata T., Orlando, Ludovic, Barrett, James H., Star, Bastiaan·2017·Molecular Ecology Resources

Abstract

The feasibility of genome‐scale studies from archaeological material remains critically dependent on the ability to access endogenous, authentic DNA . In the majority of cases, this represents a few per cent of the DNA extract, at most. A number of specific pre‐extraction protocols for bone powder aimed to improve ancient DNA recovery before library amplification have recently been developed. Here, we test the effects of combining two of such protocols, a bleach wash and a predigestion step, on 12 bone samples of Atlantic cod and domestic horse aged 750–1350 cal. years before present. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we show that combined together, bleach wash and predigestion consistently yield DNA libraries with higher endogenous content than either of these methods alone. Additionally, the molecular complexity of these libraries is improved and endogenous DNA templates show larger size distributions. Other library characteristics, such as DNA damage profiles or the composition of microbial communities, are little affected by the pre‐extraction protocols. Application of the combined protocol presented in this study will facilitate the genetic analysis of an increasing number of ancient remains and will reduce the cost of whole‐genome sequencing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1755-0998.12623

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. BarrettJH(2012)Being an Islander: Production and Identity at Quoygrew Orkney AD 900‐1600.McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Cambridge.
  2. 10.3721/037.002.0108 · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0003598X00045774 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1174462 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.07.003 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1405138111 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nmeth.2375 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/srep11184 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/mec.12690 · DOI
  11. Sarkissian C, 2015, Ancient genomics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370, 1
  12. 10.1093/molbev/msu074 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1215210110 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/1755-0998.12470 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024161 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-177 · DOI
  18. Hofreiter M, 2014, The future of ancient DNA: technical advances and conceptual shifts, BioEssays, 3, 284
  19. 10.1038/nature11234 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017 · DOI
  21. 10.2144/000114320 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.07.001 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1755-0998.12546 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/molbev/msm015 · DOI
  27. Meyer M, 2010, Illumina Sequencing Library Preparation for Highly Multiplexed Target Capture and Sequencing, 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/gr.122747.111 · DOI
  29. 10.1101/gr.163592.113 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129102 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Poinar HN, 2000, Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all, Science, 5482, 1139
  32. 10.1186/1297-9686-44-21 · DOI
  33. Schroeder H, 2015, Genome‐wide ancestry of 17th‐century enslaved Africans from the Caribbean, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 3669, 10.1073/pnas.1421784112 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nprot.2014.063 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1105107108 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/1471-2180-13-248 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl117 · DOI
  39. Tørresen OK, 2016, An improved genome assembly uncovers a prolific tandem repeat structure in Atlantic cod, bioRxiv, 1, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Metadata

Authors
Boessenkool, S., Hanghøj, K., Nistelberger, H. M., Der Sarkissian, C., Gondek, A. T., Orlando, L., Barrett, J. H., & Star, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biosciences Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis University of Oslo PO Box 1066 Blindern N‐0316 Oslo Norway
  • Centre for Geogenetics Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Øster Voldgade 5‐7 1350 Copenhagen K Denmark
  • McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3ER UK
Venue
Molecular Ecology Resources
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-15
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
742-751
ISSN
  • 1755-098X
  • 1755-0998
Cited by
124
References
11
Language
en
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (#230821/F20, #203850/E40, #221734/O30)
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd (#4002‐00152B)
  • Université de Toulouse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review