Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing Microbial and Human Contamination in DNA Extractions from Ancient Bones and Teeth

Korlević, Petra, Gerber, Tobias, Gansauge, Marie-Theres, Hajdinjak, Mateja, Nagel, Sarah, Aximu-Petri, Ayinuer, Meyer, Matthias·2015·BioTechniques

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2144/000114320

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bleach treatment of bone powder can reduce exogenous DNA fraction.

    “Specific chemical treatment of bone powder, for example with bleach 40,42 , can reduce the exogenous DNA fraction and may be attempted in cases of repeated failure due to contamination; however, such treatment can also artificially age modern contaminant DNA, and so authentication of bleachtreated samples should be performed with care.”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1002/bies.201400160 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.07.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.013 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/bm7008813 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1188046 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/srep00074 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1405138111 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1186/1471-2105-15-247 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1101/gr.174201.114 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.07.001 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/gr.122747.111 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-177 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/srep11184 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nprot.2013.038 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  19. 10.2144/000113809 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014004 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt117 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gku699 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/206779a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.063 · DOI
  26. Persson, P. 1992. A method to recover DNA from ancient bones. Ancient DNA Newsl.1:25–27.
  27. Götherström, A. and K.Lidén. 1996. A modified DNA extraction method for bone and teeth. Laborativ Arkeologi9:53–56.
  28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.06.004 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0503718102 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/molbev/msm015 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024161 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Korlević, P., Gerber, T., Gansauge, M.-T., Hajdinjak, M., Nagel, S., Aximu-Petri, A., & Meyer, M.
Affiliations
Department of Evolutionary Genetics,Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Venue
BioTechniques
Published
2015-08
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
87-93
ISSN
  • 0736-6205
  • 1940-9818
Cited by
296
References
9
Language
en
Funders
the Max Planck Society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review