Cited by 29Species Distribution and Climate ChangeAmphibian and Reptile BiologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Acoustic species distribution models ( aSDMs ): A framework to forecast shifts in calling behaviour under climate change

Open access
Desjonquères, Camille, Villén‐Pérez, Sara, De Marco, Paulo, Márquez, Rafael, Beltrán, Juan F., Llusia, Diego·2022·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are a key tool for biogeography and climate change research, although current approaches have some significant drawbacks. The use of species occurrence constrains predictions of correlative models, while there is a general lack of eco‐physiological data to develop mechanistic models. Passive acoustic monitoring is an emerging technique in ecology that may help to overcome these limitations. By remotely tracking animal behaviour across species geographical ranges, researchers can estimate the climatic breadth of species activity and provide a baseline for refined predictive models. However, such integrative approach still remains to be developed. Here, we propose the following: (a) a general and transferable method to build acoustic SDMs, a novel tool combining acoustic and biogeographical information, (b) a detailed comparison with standard correlative and mechanistic models, (c) a step‐by‐step guide to develop aSDMs and (d) a study case to assess their effectiveness and illustrate model outputs, using a year‐round monitoring of calling behaviour of the Iberian tree frog at the thermal extremes of its distribution range. This method aims at forecasting changes in environmental suitability for acoustic communication, a key and climate‐dependent behaviour for a wide variety of animal taxa. aSDMs identified strong associations between calling behaviour and local environmental conditions and showed robust and consistent predictive performance using two alternative models (regression and boundary). Furthermore, these models better captured climatic variation than correlative models as they use observations at higher temporal resolution. These results support aSDMs as efficient tools to model calling behaviour under future climate scenarios. The proposed approach offers a promising basis to explore the capacity of vocal species to deal with climate change, supported by an innovative integration of two disciplines: bioacoustics and biogeography. aSMDs are grounded on ecologically realistic conditions and provide spatially and temporally explicit predictions on calling behaviour, with direct implications in reproduction and survival. This enables to precisely forecast shifts in breeding phenology, geographic distribution or species persistence. Our study demonstrates how acoustic monitoring may represent an increasingly valuable tool for climate change research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.13923

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Peterson, A. T. (2011). Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desjonquères, C., Villén‐Pérez, S., De Marco, P., Márquez, R., Beltrán, J. F., & Llusia, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Theory, Metacommunities and Landscape Ecology lab, ICB‐V Universidade Federal de Goiás Goiânia Brazil
  • Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (ES)
  • Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Desjonquères, Camille
  • Llusia, Diego
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07-13
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
2275-2288
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285394976
Cited by
29
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Consejería de Educación e Investigación (2020‐T1/AMB‐20636, 2017‐T2/AMB‐6035)
  • European Commission (EAVESTROP‐661408)
  • Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España (CGL2017‐88764‐R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
calling behavior, climate change, Hyla arborea, bioacoustics, passive acoustic monitoring, vocal communication, environmental suitability, temperature extremes, breeding phenology, boundary model, species distribution modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review