Cited by 82

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation fidelity coevolves with longevity

Ke, Zhonghe, Mallik, Pramit, Johnson, Adam B., Luna, Facundo, Nevo, Eviatar, Zhang, Zhengdong D., Gladyshev, Vadim N., Seluanov, Andrei, Gorbunova, Vera·2017·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Whether errors in protein synthesis play a role in aging has been a subject of intense debate. It has been suggested that rare mistakes in protein synthesis in young organisms may result in errors in the protein synthesis machinery, eventually leading to an increasing cascade of errors as organisms age. Studies that followed generally failed to identify a dramatic increase in translation errors with aging. However, whether translation fidelity plays a role in aging remained an open question. To address this issue, we examined the relationship between translation fidelity and maximum lifespan across 17 rodent species with diverse lifespans. To measure translation fidelity, we utilized sensitive luciferase‐based reporter constructs with mutations in an amino acid residue critical to luciferase activity, wherein misincorporation of amino acids at this mutated codon re‐activated the luciferase. The frequency of amino acid misincorporation at the first and second codon positions showed strong negative correlation with maximum lifespan. This correlation remained significant after phylogenetic correction, indicating that translation fidelity coevolves with longevity. These results give new life to the role of protein synthesis errors in aging: Although the error rate may not significantly change with age, the basal rate of translation errors is important in defining lifespan across mammals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.12628

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cellular error rates inverse to mammalian species lifespan include somatic mutations, epigenetic dysregulation, transcription and translation errors.

    “Cellular error rates that have been found to be inverse to mammalian species lifespan include somatic mutations12, epigenetic dysregulation14, transcription and translation errors13.”

    From A damage accumulation model identifies distinct aging regimes across species (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The citation is attached to transcription and translation errors, not to somatic mutations or epigenetic dysregulation. The Results and discussion report that mistranslation at the first and second codon positions correlates negatively with species maximum lifespan, but say the assay's results are unlikely to reflect transcription errors. The paper therefore does not establish the claimed lifespan relationship for transcription errors. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long-lived animals share enhanced DNA repair, reduced molecular error rates and other processes.

    “Long-lived animals share enhanced DNA repair3,5,9–11, reduced molecular error rates and other processes6,12–14.”
  • Modern measurement techniques have not found evidence that protein translation errors increase with age.

    “However, modern measurement techniques have not found evidence that protein translation errors increase with age 51.”

    From Targeting the biology of aging with mTOR inhibitors (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

  • Long-living mammals have enhanced repair and reduced error rates in several processes.

    “Long-living mammals have indeed been found to have enhanced repair and reduced error rates in several processes (some of which may not drive aging).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00158 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1313473110 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007147 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/emm.2014.117 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030056 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3396 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/1471-2148-12-88 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.030 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00005-X · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00267.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/science.1115535 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.059 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1261/rna.294907 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1064242 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0606272104 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/ncomms6650 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/emboj/18.11.3107 · DOI
  19. 10.1201/9780429258770 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0047-6374(83)90002-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/336179a0 · DOI
  22. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.061903.155440 · DOI
  23. 10.2174/092986708783330692 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.49.4.517 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.67.3.1476 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/243441a0 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00266.x · DOI
  28. 10.18632/aging.100958 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000517 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nrmicro2472 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1179700 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/ncomms7158 · DOI
  33. 10.4161/cc.11.1.18736 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00431.x · DOI
  35. Seluanov A, 2010, Establishing primary adult fibroblast cultures from rodents, J. Vis. Exp., 44
  36. 10.1016/j.exger.2003.09.008 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.013 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.037 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/nature05603 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1159/000213132 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gks1155 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/jcp.1041030215 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.036 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nature07582 · DOI
  45. 10.1261/rna.2241810 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ke, Z., Mallik, P., Johnson, A. B., Luna, F., Nevo, E., Zhang, Z. D., Gladyshev, V. N., Seluanov, A., & Gorbunova, V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biology University of Rochester Rochester NY USA
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras CONICET‐UNMdP Mar del Plata Argentina
  • Institute of Evolution University of Haifa Haifa 3498838 Israel
  • Department of Genetics Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx NY USA
  • Division of Genetics Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
988-993
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
82
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review