Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA methylation signatures in Blood - DNA of Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome

Bejaoui, Yosra, Razzaq, Aleem, Yousri, Noha A., Oshima, Junko, Megarbane, Andre, Qannan, Abeer, Potabattula, Ramya, Alam, Tanvir, Martin, George M., Horn, Henning F., Haaf, Thomas, Horvath, Steve, El Hajj, Nady·2022·Aging Cell

Abstract

Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) is an extremely rare genetic disorder caused by mutations in the LMNA gene and characterized by premature and accelerated aging beginning in childhood. In this study, we performed the first genome‐wide methylation analysis on blood DNA of 15 patients with progeroid laminopathies using Infinium Methylation EPIC arrays including 8 patients with classical HGPS. We could observe DNA methylation alterations at 61 CpG sites as well as 32 significant regions following a 5 Kb tiling analysis. Differentially methylated probes were enriched for phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process, phospholipid biosynthetic process, sarcoplasm, sarcoplasmic reticulum, phosphatase regulator activity, glycerolipid biosynthetic process, glycerophospholipid biosynthetic process, and phosphatidylinositol metabolic process. Differential methylation analysis at the level of promoters and CpG islands revealed no significant methylation changes in blood DNA of progeroid laminopathy patients. Nevertheless, we could observe significant methylation differences in classic HGPS when specifically looking at probes overlapping solo‐WCGW partially methylated domains. Comparing aberrantly methylated sites in progeroid laminopathies, classic Werner syndrome, and Down syndrome revealed a common significantly hypermethylated region in close vicinity to the transcription start site of a long non‐coding RNA located anti‐sense to the Catenin Beta Interacting Protein 1 gene (CTNNBIP1). By characterizing epigenetically altered sites, we identify possible pathways/mechanisms that might have a role in the accelerated aging of progeroid laminopathies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.13555

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cells from patients and mice with progeroid syndromes exhibit DNA methylation changes that partially recapitulate those found in normal aging.

    “Cells from patients and mice with progeroid syndromes also exhibit DNA methylation changes that partially recapitulate those found in normal aging 48 .”

    From Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports DNA methylation changes in blood from patients with progeroid laminopathies, including hypomethylation at sites associated with chronological aging. It treats premature aging as a possible explanation, while the Results find no age correlation at another altered site. The paper does not establish the claim for cells from progeroid mice. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1038/s41588-019-0526-4 · DOI
  2. Atsem S., 2016, Paternal age effects on sperm FOXK1 and KCNA7 methylation and transmission into the next generation, Human Molecular Genetics, 25, 4996
  3. 10.1038/ng.969 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz456 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.exger.2004.02.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115732 · DOI
  8. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314177 · DOI
  9. 10.4161/nucl.13723 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.08.004 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1084125 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nature11082 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1080/15592294.2016.1192736 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.007 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nature01629 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nrm2738 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0500398102 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/s41598-019-43820-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature06947 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s13148-019-0787-x · DOI
  21. 10.1101/gr.157743.113 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31346 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.013 · DOI
  25. 10.4161/epi.23366 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1529/biophysj.107.118786 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/acel.13048 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31531 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1186/s13073-020-00749-y · DOI
  31. 10.3390/ijms14011310 · DOI
  32. 10.18632/aging.101414 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/science.1181369 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nature09879 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/19491034.2020.1832734 · DOI
  36. 10.3390/nu13072185 · DOI
  37. 10.3390/cells8030271 · DOI
  38. 10.4161/19491034.2014.990855 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/nar/gku324 · DOI
  40. 10.18632/aging.101217 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/acel.12995 · DOI
  42. 10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1101/gr.138032.112 · DOI
  44. 10.1101/gr.141028.112 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.exger.2007.09.004 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/382536a0 · DOI
  47. 10.1186/s13059-019-1664-9 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nrg3594 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01906.x · DOI
  51. 10.2217/epi-2018-0059 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/acel.13181 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty892 · DOI
  54. 10.3389/fgene.2020.00171 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.0602569103 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1242/jcs.107.1.61 · DOI
  57. 10.1101/gad.14.14.1741 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.001 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/s00418-016-1411-1 · DOI
  60. 10.3390/ijms16023251 · DOI
  61. 10.1146/annurev-genom-121219-083616 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/path.2999 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Xie Y., 2019, PI3K/Akt signaling transduction pathway, erythropoiesis and glycolysis in hypoxia (Review), Molecular Medicine Reports, 19, 783

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bejaoui, Y., Razzaq, A., Yousri, N. A., Oshima, J., Megarbane, A., Qannan, A., Potabattula, R., Alam, T., Martin, G. M., Horn, H. F., Haaf, T., Horvath, S., & El Hajj, N.
Affiliations
  • College of Health and Life Sciences Qatar Foundation Hamad Bin Khalifa University Doha Qatar
  • Genetic Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine‐Qatar Doha Qatar
  • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
  • Department of Human Genetics Gilbert and Rose‐Marie Ghagoury School of Medicine Lebanese American University Byblos Lebanon
  • Institute of Human Genetics Julius Maximilians University Würzburg Germany
  • College of Science and Engineering Hamad Bin Khalifa University Doha Qatar
  • Department of Human Genetics David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
21
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
40
References
7
Language
en
Funders
Qatar National Research Fund (PPM2‐0226‐170020)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review