CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrative analysis of clinical and epigenetic biomarkers of mortality

Huan, Tianxiao, Nguyen, Steve, Colicino, Elena, Ochoa‐Rosales, Carolina, Hill, W. David, Brody, Jennifer A., Soerensen, Mette, Zhang, Yan, Baldassari, Antoine, Elhadad, Mohamed Ahmed, Toshiko, Tanaka, Zheng, Yinan, Domingo‐Relloso, Arce, Lee, Dong Heon, Ma, Jiantao, Yao, Chen, Liu, Chunyu, Hwang, Shih‐Jen, Joehanes, Roby, Fornage, Myriam, Bressler, Jan, van Meurs, Joyce B.J., Debrabant, Birgit, Mengel‐From, Jonas, Hjelmborg, Jacob, Christensen, Kaare, Vokonas, Pantel, Schwartz, Joel, Gahrib, Sina A., Sotoodehnia, Nona, Sitlani, Colleen M., Kunze, Sonja, Gieger, Christian, Peters, Annette, Waldenberger, Melanie, Deary, Ian J., Ferrucci, Luigi, Qu, Yishu, Greenland, Philip, Lloyd‐Jones, Donald M., Hou, Lifang, Bandinelli, Stefania, Voortman, Trudy, Hermann, Brenner, Baccarelli, Andrea, Whitsel, Eric, Pankow, James S., Levy, Daniel·2022·Aging Cell
DOI 10.1111/acel.13608PMC PMC9197414

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

DNA methylation (DNAm) has been reported to be associated with many diseases and with mortality. We hypothesized that the integration of DNAm with clinical risk factors would improve mortality prediction. We performed an epigenome‐wide association study of whole blood DNAm in relation to mortality in 15 cohorts ( n = 15,013). During a mean follow‐up of 10 years, there were 4314 deaths from all causes including 1235 cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths and 868 cancer deaths. Ancestry‐stratified meta‐analysis of all‐cause mortality identified 163 CpGs in European ancestry (EA) and 17 in African ancestry (AA) participants at p < 1 × 10 −7 , of which 41 (EA) and 16 (AA) were also associated with CVD death, and 15 (EA) and 9 (AA) with cancer death. We built DNAm‐based prediction models for all‐cause mortality that predicted mortality risk after adjusting for clinical risk factors. The mortality prediction model trained by integrating DNAm with clinical risk factors showed an improvement in prediction of cancer death with 5% increase in the C‐index in a replication cohort, compared with the model including clinical risk factors alone. Mendelian randomization identified 15 putatively causal CpGs in relation to longevity, CVD, or cancer risk. For example, cg06885782 (in KCNQ4 ) was positively associated with risk for prostate cancer (Beta = 1.2, P MR = 4.1 × 10 −4 ) and negatively associated with longevity (Beta = −1.9, P MR = 0.02). Pathway analysis revealed that genes associated with mortality‐related CpGs are enriched for immune‐ and cancer‐related pathways. We identified replicable DNAm signatures of mortality and demonstrated the potential utility of CpGs as informative biomarkers for prediction of mortality risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.13608

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/nar/gky993 · DOI
  3. 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/nar/gky1120 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006076 · DOI
  6. 10.18632/aging.103408 · DOI
  7. 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1542 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ijc.31189 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.08.032 · DOI
  10. 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.070 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/JAHA.117.008108 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/gb‐2013‐14‐10‐r115 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/s41467‐019‐12228‐z · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1063852 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.18632/aging.101414 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nature14177 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1186/gb‐2012‐13‐6‐r44 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1186/s13059‐021‐02388‐x · DOI
  24. 10.1186/s13059‐015‐0584‐6 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/ije/dyu277 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002215 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nature24284 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41523‐017‐0032‐8 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ng.3826 · DOI
  30. 10.18632/aging.101334 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2337/db16‐1253 · DOI
  32. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311928 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/genes9020078 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts680 · DOI
  35. 10.7554/eLife.39856 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkt090 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.arr.2017.06.005 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/humu.20375 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.026 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ng.3002 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/ng.2797 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/s41467-018-03781-0 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/jcmm.14886 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Huan, T., Nguyen, S., Colicino, E., Ochoa‐Rosales, C., Hill, W. D., Brody, J. A., Soerensen, M., Zhang, Y., Baldassari, A., Elhadad, M. A., Toshiko, T., Zheng, Y., Domingo‐Relloso, A., Lee, D. H., Ma, J., Yao, C., Liu, C., Hwang, S., Joehanes, R., Fornage, M., Bressler, J., van Meurs, J. B. J., Debrabant, B., Mengel‐From, J., Hjelmborg, J., Christensen, K., Vokonas, P., Schwartz, J., Gahrib, S. A., Sotoodehnia, N., Sitlani, C. M., Kunze, S., Gieger, C., Peters, A., Waldenberger, M., Deary, I. J., Ferrucci, L., Qu, Y., Greenland, P., Lloyd‐Jones, D. M., Hou, L., Bandinelli, S., Voortman, T., Hermann, B., Baccarelli, A., Whitsel, E., Pankow, J. S., & Levy, D.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-12
Volume
21
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
DOI
10.1111/acel.13608
PMC
PMC9197414
Cited by
25
References
12
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK063491)
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN268201500001I, N01‐HC‐25195)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG023629)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000124)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268200800007C, HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268201800001C, K08HL116640, N01HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086, R01HL087652, R01HL092111, R01HL103612, R01HL105756, R01HL111089, R01HL116747, R01HL120393, U01HL080295, U01HL130114)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review