Community reinforcement and family training and rates of treatment entry: a systematic review.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adaptations with different modes of delivery and target addictions have found highly divergent rates of success for Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT). This study aims to clarify which (1) treatment components and (2) participant characteristics contribute to rates of identified patient (IP) treatment entry. METHOD: Systematic review of CRAFT evaluation studies of all designs (controlled and uncontrolled) with data synthesis and narrative analysis of addiction treatment services and university research departments in North America and Europe. RESULTS: A total of 691 concerned significant others (CSOs), predominately female spouses/parents, participating in 20 distinct treatment conditions from 14 studies. The main outcome of IP treatment entry rate reported by CSOs up to 12 months after starting CRAFT with key predictors/correlates including IP addiction, IP-CSO relationship, CRAFT modality and integration of treatment for IP. Meta-analysis found CRAFT to be twice as effective as controls/comparison groups. Multi-modality treatment, including both individual and group sessions, yielded the highest IP treatment entry rates (77 and 86%), with progressively lower rates for individual (12.5-71%), group (60%) and self-directed workbook (13.3-40%) modalities. While all five studies targeting gambling addiction had consistently low rates (12.5-23%), other treatment components, including therapist training, treatment fidelity and integrating treatment for the IP, were implicated. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptations of Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training for different delivery modalities and addictions have yielded widely varying rates of treatment engagement for the identified patient, with those offering the most comprehensive support to the concerned significant other, including individual and group sessions, having highest levels of engagement success.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
8 of 43 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Rates of IP treatment entry across recent CRAFT innovations have been highly divergent, ranging from >60% down to 12.5%.
“Rates of IP treatment entry across these innovations have been highly divergent, ranging from the previously established levels of > 60% [21] down to 12.5% [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] 21. Kirby K. C., Benishek L. A., Kerwin M. E., Dugosh K. L., Carpenedo C. M., Bresani E., et al. Analyzing components of community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT): is treatment entry training sufficient? Psychol Addict Behav 2017; 31: 818-27. source
The citation to this paper is attached to the 12.5% end of the range. Results §3.4.1 reports initial IP treatment-entry rates of 62% for CRAFT, 63% for TEnT, and 37% for ANF—not 12.5%. Results §3.4.3 separately reports a 29% transfer rate among IPs who attended brief treatment. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] 22. Nayoski N., Hodgins D. C. The efficacy of individual commu- nity reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. J Gambl Is- sues 2016; 33: 189-212. source
- Premisecitation
Recent innovations in online CRAFT delivery for military families have been singularly focused on CSO wellbeing/relationship quality.
“Recent innovations in online CRAFT delivery for military families have, in fact, been singularly focused on this [34]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] 34. Osilla K. C., Trail T. E., Pedersen E. R., Gore K. L., Tolpadi A., Rodriguez L. M. Efficacy of a web-based intervention for con- cerned spouses of service members and veterans with alcohol misuse. J Marital Fam Ther 2018; 44: 292-306. source
In “Partners Connect: A Web-Based Adaption of CRAFT for Military CPs,” the authors describe improving concerned partners’ mental health and communication as the intervention’s primary goal. “Singularly focused” overstates this: the same section also describes a hoped-for reduction in partners’ drinking and assesses outcomes for service members and veterans. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Brigham et al. found a significant effect on retention only when the IP was the CSO's adult child.
“They found a significant effect on retention only when the IP was the CSO's adult child”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] 37. Brigham G., Slesnick N., Winhusen T., Lewis D., Guo X., Somoza E. A randomized pilot clinical trial to evaluate the ef- ficacy of community reinforcement and family training for treatment retention (CRAFT-T) for improving outcomes for patients completing opioid detoxification. Drug Alcohol Depend [internet] 2014; 138: 240-3. Available at:; http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/306/ CN-00989306/frame.html. source
The Results (section 3.3) report a significant retention effect for IPs with parental-family CSOs, while the overall effect approached but did not reach significance. The Methods (section 2.4) define that subgroup to include parents, aunts, grandparents, and siblings—not only CSOs whose adult child was the IP. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingreasoning
With one exception, type of CSO-IP relationship was not associated with IP treatment entry.
“With one exception, type of CSO-IP relationship was not associated with IP treatment entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Overall, the nature of the CSO-IP relationship was not a determining factor for IP treatment entry.
“Overall, the nature of the CSO-IP relationship was not a determining factor for IP treatment entry”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Self-directed workbook modality CRAFT yielded IP treatment entry rates ranging from 13.3 to 40%.
“self-directed workbook (13.3-40%) modalities”
- Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
“five self-directed workbook (13.3-40%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
- Findingown data
Multi-modality CRAFT treatment including both individual and group sessions yielded the highest IP treatment entry rates (77 and 86%).
“Multi-modality treatment, including both individual and group sessions, yielded the highest IP treatment entry rates (77 and 86%), with progressively lower rates for individual (12.5-71%), group (60%) and self-directed workbook (13.3-40%) modalities.”
- Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
“two multi-modality (77 and 86%)”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“the two interventions with the very highest IP treatment entry rates comprised multi-modality treatments offering the CSO a combination of individual and group sessions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Sisson R. W., Azrin N. H. Family-member involvement to ini- tiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1986; 17: 15-21. source
- cites [17] 17. Meyers R. J., Miller W. R., Smith J. E., Tonigan J. S. A random- ized trial of two methods for engaging treatment-refusing drug users through concerned significant others. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 1182-5. source
- Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
- Findingown data
IP sex did not appear to be associated with IP treatment entry rates.
“IP sex was provided for nine treatment conditions, with % of female IPs ranging from 0 to 41%, and did not appear to be associated with IP treatment entry rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CRAFT was no more effective than controls when the IP had a gambling addiction (RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.55-1.75, P ≤ 0.95, NNT = 2).
“it was no more effective than controls when the IP had a gambling addiction (RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.55-1.75,P ≤ 0.95, NNT = 2; Q-test: χ 2 (2) = 0.15 (P = 0.93), I 2 = 0%; see Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Individual modality CRAFT yielded IP treatment entry rates ranging from 12.5 to 71%.
“progressively lower rates for individual (12.5-71%), group (60%) and self-directed workbook (13.3-40%) modalities.”
- Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
“11 individual (12.5-71%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
- Findingcitation
Meyers et al. found that significantly more parent CSOs (83%) successfully supported treatment entry of their adult children IPs than non-parent CSOs (31%).
“An exception to this was reported by Meyers et al., who found that significantly more parent CSOs (83%) successfully supported treatment entry of their adult children IPs than non-parent CSOs (31%) [15].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Meyers R. J., Mille W. R., Hill D. E., Tonigan J. S. Community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT): engaging unmotivated drug users in treatment. J Subst Abuse 1998; 10: 291-308. source
- Findingreasoning
Completing multiple modalities in a treatment condition is not associated with rate of IP treatment entry.
“Thus, it seems that while neither number of sessions offered/completed, nor completing multiple modalities in a treatment condition, are associated with rate of IP treatment entry, being offered multi-modality treatment may be.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study quality did not appear to be related to IP treatment entry.
“On balance, study quality did not appear to be related to IP treatment entry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Meta-analysis of 11 CRAFT treatment condition groups directly compared to other treatment or control conditions found CRAFT to be twice as effective for IP treatment entry (RR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.51-2.75, P ≤ 0.00001, NNT = 2).
“Meta-analysis found CRAFT to be twice as effective as controls/comparison groups.”
- Also stated in: § Overall effectiveness of CRAFT interventions versus other treatment conditions · plain
“Meta-analysis of the 11 different CRAFT treatment condition groups directly compared to other treatment or control conditions found CRAFT to be twice as effective [rate ratio (RR) = 2.04, 95% CI =1.51-2.75,P ≤ 0.00001, number needed to treat (NNT) = 2; Q-test: χ 2 (10) = 16.12 (P = 0.10), I 2 = 38%, see Fig. 2].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Overall effectiveness of CRAFT interventions versus other treatment conditions · plain
- Findingreasoning
Number of sessions offered (between four and 14) does not appear to be associated with success.
“On balance, number of sessions (between four and 14) offered does not appear to be associated with success.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Throughout treatment conditions for substance addictions, self-directed workbooks had the lowest rates of IP treatment entry.
“Throughout treatment conditions for substance addictions, self-directed workbooks had the lowest rates of IP treatment entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Number of sessions attended appears to be unrelated to IP treatment entry.
“In addition, number of sessions offered does not equate to the number of sessions attended, which also appears to be unrelated to IP treatment entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CRAFT was more than twice as effective as control/comparison when the IP had a substance addiction (RR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.77-3.12, P ≤ 0.000001, NNT = 2).
“Meta-analysis of the 11 different CRAFT treatment condition groups that were compared to a control/comparison found that while CRAFT was more than twice as effective when the IP had a substance addiction (RR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.77-3.12,P ≤ 0.000001, NNT = 2; Q-test: χ 2 (7) = 9.20 (P = 0.24), I 2 = 24%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All five treatment conditions targeting gambling addiction had consistently low IP treatment entry rates (12.5-23%).
“While all five studies targeting gambling addiction had consistently low rates (12.5-23%)”
- Also stated in: § IP addiction · plain
“The five treatment conditions that evaluated CRAFT for CSOs of gambling addicted IPs-all reported by the same research team-reported consistently lower IP treatment entry rates, ranging between 12.5 and 23%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § IP addiction · plain
- Findingown data
Group modality CRAFT yielded an IP treatment entry rate of 60%.
“group (60%)”
- Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
“two group (both 60%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CRAFT treatment modality · plain
- Findingnone given
Associations between basic demographic characteristics and IP treatment entry are less clear.
“While associations with basic demographic characteristics are less clear”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rate of treatment entry was not associated with the point at which it was measured, which ranged between 1.5 and 12 months.
“Rate of treatment entry was not associated with point at which it was measured, which ranged between 1.5 and 12 months, with high rates reported for brief (e.g.86% with 2 months [16]) and relatively long (e.g.77% at 6-month follow-up [17]) intervals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Sisson R. W., Azrin N. H. Family-member involvement to ini- tiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1986; 17: 15-21. source
- cites [17] 17. Meyers R. J., Miller W. R., Smith J. E., Tonigan J. S. A random- ized trial of two methods for engaging treatment-refusing drug users through concerned significant others. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 1182-5. source
- Findingnone given
Many studies included in this review do not report on IP retention.
“While many studies included here do not report on IP retention”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is a range of IP treatment entry rates across CRAFT interventions reviewed here.
“Given the range of IP treatment entry rates across CRAFT interventions reviewed here”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among all 20 treatment condition groups, IP treatment entry rates ranged from 12.5 to 86%.
“Among all 20 treatment condition groups IP treatment entry rates ranged from 12.5 to 86%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The five treatment conditions targeting problem gambling were all conducted in Canada.
“Given that these five studies were all conducted in Canada, country of origin and regional variations in service availability may impact the success rates of CRAFT in general.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The five treatment conditions targeting problem gambling, all with IP treatment entry rates below 25%, were almost entirely lacking in these key treatment characteristics.
“The five treatment conditions targeting problem gambling, which all had IP treatment entry rates below 25%, were almost entirely lacking in these key treatment characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Being offered multi-modality treatment may be associated with rate of IP treatment entry.
“Thus, it seems that while neither number of sessions offered/completed, nor completing multiple modalities in a treatment condition, are associated with rate of IP treatment entry, being offered multi-modality treatment may be.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Inferences on the relative causal contribution of specific treatment characteristics to IP treatment entry are limited because several treatment characteristics overlap inconsistently within and across studies.
“Inferences on relative causal contribution to IP treatment entry are limited, as several treatment characteristics overlap inconsistently within and across studies (e.g.type of addiction, availability and cost of treatment in different countries, and training by the team who developed CRAFT).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Multimodality offerings that align with the fundamentals of CRAFT are consistently most effective for IP treatment entry.
“finding multimodality offerings that align with the fundamentals of CRAFT consistently most effective”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given the range of confounding variables, it is impossible to infer with confidence why rates among the gambling studies are markedly lower than among CRAFT for substance addictions studies.
“Given this range of confounding variables, it is impossible to infer with confidence why rates among these studies are markedly lower than among CRAFT for substance addictions studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
CSO motivation and assertiveness toward the IP appear to be important factors for IP treatment entry.
“CSO motivation and assertiveness toward the IP appear to be important factors for IP treatment entry”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A study published in German has shown that self-reported endorsement of the motive 'influencing the addict to seek treatment' prior to starting CRAFT was significantly associated with successful IP treatment entry.
“Self-reported endorsement of the motive 'influencing the addict to seek treatment' prior to starting CRAFT was significantly associated with successful IP treatment entry, while motives such as 'wanting to improve own wellbeing' and 'reduce the IP's addictive behaviour' were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] 33. Bischof G., Iwen J., Rumpf H. J. Impact of motives on treat- ment outcomes for Concerned Significant Others supporting treatment-seeking of addicts through Community Reinforce- ment and Family Training (CRAFT). Addiction Treatment 2013; 14(02): 78-83.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Rates of entry from gambling-focused studies have been consistently low.
“For example, the use of a self-directed workbook in one treatment condition has proved extremely effective [18], while hardly effective at all in another [22], and the rates of entry from gamblingfocused studies have been consistently low [20,22,23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Hodgins D., Toneatto T., Makarchuk K., Skinner W., Vincent S. Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: a randomized con- trolled trial. J Gambl Stud [internet] 2007; 23: 215-30. Accessed date January 25th, 2019. Available at:; http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/151/ CN-00609151/frame.html, https://link.springer.com/con- tent/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10899-006-9052-2.pdf. source
- cites [22] 22. Nayoski N., Hodgins D. C. The efficacy of individual commu- nity reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. J Gambl Is- sues 2016; 33: 189-212. source
- cites [23] 23. Makarchuk K., Hodgins D. C., Peden N. Development of a brief intervention for concerned significant others of problem gam- blers. Addict Disord Treat 2002; 1: 126-34. source
- Premisecitation
Benefits to CSOs are more pronounced than IP treatment entry in interventions for problem gamblers.
“It is clear, for example, that benefits to CSOs are more pronounced than IP treatment entry in interventions for problem gamblers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] 23. Makarchuk K., Hodgins D. C., Peden N. Development of a brief intervention for concerned significant others of problem gam- blers. Addict Disord Treat 2002; 1: 126-34. source
- Premisecitation
Considerable evidence supports CRAFT as an effective intervention for CSOs to support their loved one to enter treatment.
“Considerable evidence supports CRAFT as an effective intervention for CSOs to support their loved one to enter treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13][14][15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16] 16. Sisson R. W., Azrin N. H. Family-member involvement to ini- tiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1986; 17: 15-21. source
- Premisecitation
Other findings support CSO wellbeing as a more tractable problem with web-based adaptations of CRAFT.
“and other findings support this as a more tractable problem with web-based adaptations of CRAFT [35]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] 35. Erbes CR, Kuhn, E., Gifford, E., Spoont, M. R., Meis, L. A., Polusny, M. A. et al. A pilot trial of VA-CRAFT: online training to enhance family well-being and Veteran mental health ser- vice use. Paper presented at the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2015.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Self-reported motives 'wanting to improve own wellbeing' and 'reduce the IP's addictive behaviour' were not associated with successful IP treatment entry.
“Self-reported endorsement of the motive 'influencing the addict to seek treatment' prior to starting CRAFT was significantly associated with successful IP treatment entry, while motives such as 'wanting to improve own wellbeing' and 'reduce the IP's addictive behaviour' were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] 33. Bischof G., Iwen J., Rumpf H. J. Impact of motives on treat- ment outcomes for Concerned Significant Others supporting treatment-seeking of addicts through Community Reinforce- ment and Family Training (CRAFT). Addiction Treatment 2013; 14(02): 78-83.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 23
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe use of a self-directed workbook in one treatment condition has proved extremely effective, while hardly effective at all in another.
“For example, the use of a self-directed workbook in one treatment condition has proved extremely effective [18], while hardly effective at all in another [22], and the rates of entry from gamblingfocused studies have been consistently low [20,22,23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] 18. Manuel J. K., Austin J. L., Miller W. R., McCrady B. S., Tonigan J. S., Meyers R. J., et al. Community reinforcement and family training: a pilot comparison of group and self-directed deliv- ery. J Subst Abuse Treat 2012; 43: 129-36. source
The citation [22] is attached to the claim that the self-directed workbook was hardly effective at all. Results §3.3 reports that 40% of participants in the Self-Directed CRAFT condition engaged their loved one in treatment, with no statistically significant difference from the group condition; the Discussion also says this rate exceeded those of comparison conditions in previous studies. That is contrary to the cited characterization. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] 22. Nayoski N., Hodgins D. C. The efficacy of individual commu- nity reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. J Gambl Is- sues 2016; 33: 189-212. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThis review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Statement.
“This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement [26] (see Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] 26. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., the PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review used a PRISMA flow diagram for the study search and inclusion process.
“Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of the study search and inclusion process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] 26. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., the PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAddictive disorders have pervasive negative consequences for partners, family members and friends (CSOs), who are at heightened risk of abuse, physical and mental health problems.
“Addictive disorders also have pervasive negative consequences for partners, family members and friends [concerned significant others (CSOs)] who, through intimate proximity, are at heightened risk of abuse, physical and mental health problems [7,8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Lipari RN, Van Horn S. L. Children living with parents who have a substance use disorder. The CBHSQ Report: August 24, 2017. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statis- tics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2017.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8] 8. Lander L., Howsare J., Byrne M. The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Soc Work Public Health 2013; 28: 194-205. source
The sections on parental substance abuse and child abuse report increased risks of abuse and poorer physical and mental-health outcomes for children in families affected by substance use disorders. The paper supports negative consequences for family members, especially children, but does not establish the stated heightened risks for friends or for partners and other family members as a group. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProlonged untreated addiction can cause problems for the individual and their family, and delayed treatment, often provided during a crisis, is both less effective and more costly.
“Prolonged untreated addiction can cause problems for the individual and their family, and delayed treatment, often provided during a crisis, is both less effective and more costly [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Murphy D., Palmer E., Westwood G., Busuttil W., Greenberg N. Do alcohol misuse, service utilisation, and demographic char- acteristics differ between UK veterans and members of the general public attending an NHS general hospital? J Clin Med 2016; 5: pii: E95. source
The Discussion (section 4; page not provided) suggests that veterans may seek help later and that earlier help could reduce costly hospital use, but it frames this as a question rather than a demonstrated effect. The paper does not establish that delayed treatment occurs during crises, is less effective, or causes problems for families. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe four treatment conditions achieving rates in excess of 70% were those offering multi-modality treatment and two that explicitly stated that additional crisis/emergency sessions were available.
“The four treatment conditions achieving rates in excess of 70% were those offering multi-modality treatment [16,17] and two that explicitly stated that additional (crisis/emergency) sessions were available [15,19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Sisson R. W., Azrin N. H. Family-member involvement to ini- tiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1986; 17: 15-21. source
- cites [17] 17. Meyers R. J., Miller W. R., Smith J. E., Tonigan J. S. A random- ized trial of two methods for engaging treatment-refusing drug users through concerned significant others. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 1182-5. source
- cites [15] 15. Meyers R. J., Mille W. R., Hill D. E., Tonigan J. S. Community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT): engaging unmotivated drug users in treatment. J Subst Abuse 1998; 10: 291-308. source
- cites [19] 19. Waldron H. B., Kern-Jones S., Turner C. W., Peterson T. R., Ozechowski T. J. Engaging resistant adolescents in drug abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007; 32: 133-42. source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNone of the five treatment condition groups for problem gambling included an integrated IP treatment, and these interventions demonstrated the lowest levels of IP treatment entry (12.5-23%).
“This was not the case in any of the five treatment condition groups for problem gambling, meaning that IP treatment for gambling would need to be sought independently, and these interventions demonstrated the lowest levels of IP treatment entry (12.5-23%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFourteen of the 20 treatment condition groups included an integrated treatment for the IP provided by or linked directly to the same team providing the CRAFT intervention, with IP treatment entry rates of 52-86%.
“Fourteen of the 20 treatment condition groups included an 'integrated' treatment for the IP provided by or linked directly to the same team providing the CRAFT intervention (IP treatment entry rates of 52-86%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither CSO age nor sex appeared to be associated with IP treatment entry rates.
“Neither CSO age nor sex appeared to be associated with IP treatment entry rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe only problem-gambling study that included CRAFT therapists provided therapists with just a 6-hour training session on CRAFT, and this treatment group had the lowest of all IP treatment entry rates (12.5%).
“The only problemgambling study which included CRAFT therapists (i.e. was not workbook-focused) provided therapists with just a 6-hour training session on CRAFT [22], and this treatment group had the lowest of all IP treatment entry rates (12.5%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Nayoski N., Hodgins D. C. The efficacy of individual commu- nity reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. J Gambl Is- sues 2016; 33: 189-212. source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe largest proportion of IPs were reported to be spouse/partner of the CSO in 12 treatment condition groups, adult children in six, and adolescent/young adult children in the remaining two.
“The largest proportion of IPs were reported to be spouse/partner of the CSO in 12 of the treatment condition groups, adult children in six and adolescent/young adult children in the remaining two.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of CSOs were female in all 20 groups, ranging from 72 to 100%.
“The majority of CSOs were female in all 20 groups, ranging from 72 to 100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe more effective CRAFT interventions tended to include several key treatment characteristics: individual therapy modality, thorough training and supervision for therapists, and integrated addiction treatments for IPs.
“The more effective CRAFT interventions tended to include several 'key' treatment characteristics: individual therapy modality, thorough training and supervision for therapists and integrated addiction treatments for IPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLikelihood of the IP entering treatment seems to be associated with the breadth of the treatment offered to the CSO, and not the number of sessions offered or completed.
“Likelihood of the IP entering treatment seems to be associated with the breadth of the treatment offered to the CSO, and not the number of sessions offered or completed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTherapist competence and adherence to treatment programme have both been found to be associated with positive patient outcomes in community reinforcement approach (CRA) treatment for patients.
“Therapist competence and adherence to treatment programme have both been found to be associated with positive patient outcomes in community reinforcement approach (CRA) treatment for patients [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. Campos-Melady M., Smith J. E., Meyers R. J., Godley S. H., Godley M. D. The effect of therapists' adherence and compe- tence in delivering the adolescent community reinforcement approach on client outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav 2017; 31: 117-29. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLevel of IP treatment entry may be associated with the ease by which treatment can be accessed and/or the inclusion of both the CSO and the IP with the same service provider.
“Thus, level of IP treatment entry may be associated with the ease by which treatment can be accessed and/or the inclusion of both the CSO and the IP with the same service provider.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataQuality ratings across the 14 included studies tended to be low: two studies received a 'moderate' rating, and the remaining 12 a 'weak' rating.
“Quality ratings across the 14 included studies tended to be low: two studies received a 'moderate' rating, and the remaining 12 a 'weak' rating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe potential to provide a relatively personalized treatment fit to the specific circumstances of each CSO may contribute to these positive outcomes.
“The potential to provide a relatively personalized treatment fit to the specific circumstances of each CSO may contribute to these positive outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSmith & Meyers instruct therapists that CRAFT should be delivered flexibly to meet the idiosyncratic needs of each CSO, in terms of which components are included and at which stage in treatment.
“This inference is consistent with Smith & Meyers' instruction to therapists that, in terms of which components are included and at which stage in treatment, CRAFT should be delivered flexibly to meet the idiosyncratic needs of each CSO [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] 11. Smith J. E., Meyers R. J. Motivating Substance Abusers to Enter Treatment: Working with Family Members. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2004.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe range of results strongly suggest that 'more is more' and 'less is less' in terms of CRAFT treatment characteristics.
“The range of results strongly suggest that 'more is more' and 'less is less' in terms of CRAFT treatment characteristics”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCRAFT utilizes the unique position of CSOs and aims to improve their understanding of addiction and to modify their own behaviour to foster a supportive environment and increase the IP's motivation to seek help.
“Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) utilizes the unique position of CSOs and aims to improve their understanding of addition and to modify their own behaviour to foster a supportive environment and increase the identified patient's (IP's) motivation to seek help [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] 11. Smith J. E., Meyers R. J. Motivating Substance Abusers to Enter Treatment: Working with Family Members. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2004.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe analysis was not pre-registered.
“the analysis was not pre-registered”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTwo researchers rated the 14 studies using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (EPHPP).
“Two researchers (H.H. and M.A.) rated the 14 studies using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (EPHPP [30]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] 30. Thomas B. H., Ciliska D., Dobbins M., Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004; 1: 176-84. Accessed date January 25th, 2019. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningAn assertive stance on the part of the CSO enhances outcomes.
“which is intriguingly consistent with the idea posited above that an assertive stance on the part of the CSO enhances outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCountry of origin and regional variations in service availability may impact the success rates of CRAFT in general.
“Given that these five studies were all conducted in Canada, country of origin and regional variations in service availability may impact the success rates of CRAFT in general.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTreatment entry rates for IPs with substance use disorders have been consistently high; most studies achieve >60%, with the earliest evaluation of CRAFT reporting a rate of 86%.
“Treatment entry rates for IPs with substance use disorders (SUDs) have been consistently high; most studies achieve > 60% [13][14][15], with the earliest evaluation of CRAFT reporting a rate of 86% [16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13][14][15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16] 16. Sisson R. W., Azrin N. H. Family-member involvement to ini- tiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1986; 17: 15-21. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFewer than 10% of the 15 million people in the United States with an alcohol use disorder seek professional help.
“Estimates suggest that fewer than 10% of the 15 million people in the United States with an alcohol use disorder seek professional help [4]; similar proportions apply to gambling addiction [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] 4. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2016 Na- tional Survey on Drug Use andHealth: Detailed Tables. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD 2017.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe results of this review should be considered exploratory.
“therefore our results should be considered exploratory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilar proportions of people with gambling addiction seek professional help as those with alcohol use disorder.
“Estimates suggest that fewer than 10% of the 15 million people in the United States with an alcohol use disorder seek professional help [4]; similar proportions apply to gambling addiction [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Cunningham J. A. Little use of treatment among problem gamblers. Psychiatr Serv 2005; 56: 1024-5. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAcross all domains the two raters agreed on 75% of all points rated (63 of 84) with a Cohen's kappa of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.41-0.75).
“Across all domains the two raters agreed on 75% of all points rated (63 of 84) with a Cohen's kappa of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.41-0.75),which is just below the boundary between moderate and good agreement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOngoing work in the United States and United Kingdom is adapting CRAFT beyond addictive illnesses to PTSD and common mental disorders in military families.
“Ongoing work in the United States and United Kingdom is adapting CRAFT beyond addictive illnesses to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and common mental disorders (CMD) in military families (e.g.[36]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] 36. VA Office of Research and Development. Helping Families Help Veterans With PTSD and Alcohol Abuse: an RCT of VA-CRAFT. Study Protocol. 2016 [Available at: https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01678196.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGambling behaviours and effects may be more difficult to detect than those associated with substance misuse, and so contingency management on the part of the CSO could be more challenging in general.
“One notable differentiator might be that gambling behaviours and effects may be more difficult to detect than those associated with substance misuse (e.g.inebriation), and so contingency management on the part of the CSO could be more challenging in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCSOs are uniquely positioned to support behaviour change and are often credited as the main reason for seeking professional help.
“However, CSOs are also uniquely positioned to support behaviour change and are often credited as the main reason for seeking professional help [9,10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] 9. Cameron L., Leventhal E. A., Leventhal H. Symptom represen- tations and affect as determinants of care seeking in a community-dwelling, adult sample population. Health Psychol 1993; 12: 171-9. source
- cites [10] 10. Cusack J., Deane F. P., Wilson C. J., Ciarrochi J. Who influence men to go to therapy? Reports from men attending psycholog- ical services. Int J Adv Counsel 2004; 26: 271-83. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAddictive disorders are characterized by diminished motivational control and intense craving for the addictive behaviour, making self-motivated treatment-seeking challenging.
“Addictive disorders are characterized by diminished motivational control and intense craving for the addictive behaviour, making self-motivated treatment-seeking challenging [1][2][3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1][2][3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAll disagreements between raters were satisfactorily resolved through discussion and with reference to the EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool Dictionary.
“Most (14) deviations were a single 'grade' (e.g.moderate score compared to weak score) and all were satisfactorily resolved through discussion and with reference to the EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool Dictionary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCRAFT developed from the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) for substance misusers, which focuses on rewarding abstinence, therefore programmes for the CSO and IP can be congruent and overlapping.
“CRAFT developed from the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) for substance misusers, which focuses on rewarding abstinence, therefore programmes for the CSO and IP can be congruent and overlapping [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] 12. Miller W. R., Meyers R. J., Hiller-Sturmhofel S. The community reinforcement approach. Alcohol Res Health 1999; 23: 116-21.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe review assessed the quality of included studies using the EPHPP quality assessment tools for quantitative studies.
“Quality assessments of included studies using the EPHPP quality assessment tools for quantitative studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not clear why rates of IP treatment entry have varied so widely.
“Despite varied intervention components within the new approaches, it is not clear why rates of IP treatment entry rates have varied so widely.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not clear which, if any, CSO and IP characteristics differentiate those who enter treatment from those who do not.
“Moreover, it is not clear which, if any, CSO and IP characteristics differentiate those who enter treatment from those who do not (e.g.[19]).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CRAFT approach avoids characteristic features of the most widely used but less effective interventions for CSOs, specifically the acceptance of powerlessness to influence change of Al/Nar-Anon and the confrontational ultimatums of the Johnson intervention.
“The CRAFT approach avoids characteristic features of the most widely used, but less effective, interventions for CSOs, specifically the acceptance of powerlessness to influence change of Al/Nar-Anon and the confrontational ultimatums of the Johnson intervention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The majority of those with addiction disorders do not enter treatment.
“the majority of those with addiction disorders do not enter treatment”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increases in the use of CRAFT over the past decade in countries such as the United Kingdom and Japan have not been accompanied by rigorous evaluation and research.
“Increases in the use of CRAFT over the past decade, in countries as diverse as the United Kingdom and Japan, has not been accompanied by rigorous evaluation and research.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CRAFT has demonstrated cross-cultural effectiveness.
“CRAFT has demonstrated cross-cultural effectiveness (Archer et al., 2020”
From Online community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) for rural concerned significant others: A randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as Archer et al., 2020
The Discussion tables (page unavailable) report CRAFT treatment-entry results from studies in the United States, Germany, Spain and Canada, and the meta-analysis finds CRAFT more effective than comparison conditions overall. But the Discussion also says that increased use in countries such as the United Kingdom and Japan has not been accompanied by rigorous evaluation. The review supports effectiveness in some countries, not a general conclusion of demonstrated cross-cultural effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCRAFT has previously been shown to increase patient engagement in treatment.
“as CRAFT has previously been shown to increase patient engagement in treatment (59, 60)”
From Initial insights from a quality improvement initiative to develop an evidence-informed young adult substance use program (2022) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The same two studies receive incompatible quality labels
MinorThe methods say that two studies were rated moderate and the other 12 weak. The results instead describe two studies as having received a strong rating.
“Quality ratings across the 14 included studies tended to be low: two studies received a 'moderate' rating, and the remaining 12 a 'weak' rating.”
“The two studies to receive a strong quality rating comprised three treatment conditions, with IP treatment entry rates of 64% [13] (for an individual treatment) and 60/40% ( [18] for group and workbook treatments, respectively).”
A treatment difference is called significant and near-significant
MinorThe results call the 40% versus 60% difference significant, whereas the discussion calls that same comparison near-significant and gives P = 0.06.
“Manuel et al.'s study compared a self-directed workbook condition to workbook plus group sessions, finding the latter to yield significantly more IP treatment entry (40 versus 60%) [18].”
“Manuel et al. point out that in their direct group plus workbook versus workbook-only comparison the near-significant difference in IP treatment entry rates (60 versus 40%, P = 0.06) is likely to be judged clinically significant by practitioners [18].”
Individual-treatment range excludes a reported 74% rate
MinorThe stated upper limit for individual treatment is 71%, although the paper reports 74% for Meyers et al. [15], whose condition is classified as individual treatment in Table 2.
“two multi-modality (77 and 86%), 11 individual (12.5-71%), two group (both 60%) and five self-directed workbook (13.3-40%).”
“There is a wide range of IP treatment entry rates among these (from 52 [27] to 74% [15]).”
Multi-modality heterogeneity test has too many degrees of freedom
MinorThe paper identifies only two multi-modality conditions, so a Q-test comparing those conditions would have one degree of freedom, not five. The reported χ2 value and P-value also align with one degree of freedom.
“multi-modality CRAFT (RR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.58-4.96,P ≤ 0.00004, NNT = 2; Q-test: χ 2 (5) = 0.87 (P = 0.35), I 2 = 0%)”
“two multi-modality (77 and 86%), 11 individual (12.5-71%), two group (both 60%) and five self-directed workbook (13.3-40%).”
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823 · see citing works
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042 · see citing works
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554 · see citing works
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544 · see citing works
Thomas, B. H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., & Micucci, S. (2004) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04006.x · Cited by 2,118 · see citing works
Treatment gap in mental health care.
Abramowitz, M. Z., Greenberg, D., & Levav, I. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 1,482 · see citing works
The treatment gap in mental health care.
(2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,419 · see citing works
The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice
Lander, L., Howsare, J., & Byrne, M. (2013) · Social work in public health · doi:10.1080/19371918.2013.759005 · Cited by 561 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Addictive disorders also have pervasive negative consequences for partners, family members and friends [concerned significant others (CSOs)] who, through intimate proximity, are at heightened risk of abuse, physical and mental health problems [7,8].”
BackgroundReasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patsopoulos, N. A., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a117 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Cameron, L. D., Leventhal, E. A., & Leventhal, H. (1993) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.12.3.171 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Cameron, L., Leventhal, E. A., & Leventhal, H. (1993) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.171 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Miller, W. R., Meyers, R. J., & Tonigan, J. S. (1999) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.67.5.688 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Miller, W. R., Meyers, R. J., & Tonigan, J. S. (1999) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.5.688 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
The experiences of affected family members: A summary of two decades of qualitative research
Orford, J., Velleman, R., Copello, A., Templeton, L., & Ibanga, A. (2010) · Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy · doi:10.3109/09687637.2010.514192 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT): engaging unmotivated drug users in treatment
Meyers, R. J., Miller, W. R., Hill, D. E., & Tonigan, J. S. (1998) · Journal of Substance Abuse · doi:10.1016/s0899-3289(99)00003-6 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Family-member involvement to initiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers
Sisson, R. W., & Azrin, N. H. (1986) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(86)90005-4 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Meyers, R. J., Miller, W. R., Smith, J. E., & Tonigan, J. S. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.5.1182 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
The Community Reinforcement Approach
Meyers, R. J., Smith, J. E., & Lash, D. N. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47939-7_14 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Roozen, H. G., De Waart, R., & Van Der Kroft, P. (2010) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03016.x · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Children Living with Parents Who Have a Substance Use Disorder
(2017) · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Motivation and Self-Regulation in Addiction: A Call for Convergence
Köpetz, C. E., Lejuez, C. W., Wiers, R. W., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612457575 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Little Use of Treatment Among Problem Gamblers
Cunningham, J. A. (2005) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.8.1024-a · Cited by 131 · see citing works
(2004) · Cited by 103 · see citing works
MOTIVATING SUBSTANCE ABUSERS TO ENTER TREATMENT: WORKING WITH FAMILY MEMBERS
HODGSON, R. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01277.x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Who Influence Men to Go to Therapy? Reports from Men Attending Psychological Services
Cusack, J., Deane, F. P., Wilson, C. J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2004) · International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling · doi:10.1023/b:adco.0000035530.44111.a8 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Kirby, K. C., Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Garvey, K. A., & LaMonaca, V. (1999) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00022-8 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Makarchuk, K., Skinner, W., & Vincent, S. (2007) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9052-2 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Engaging resistant adolescents in drug abuse treatment
Waldron, H. B., Kern-Jones, S., Turner, C. W., Peterson, T. R., & Ozechowski, T. J. (2007) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.07.007 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Bischof, G., Iwen, J., Freyer-Adam, J., & Rumpf, H.-J. (2016) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.015 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Development of a Brief Intervention for Concerned Significant Others of Problem Gamblers
Makarchuk, K., Hodgins, D. C., & Peden, N. (2002) · Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment · doi:10.1097/00132576-200211000-00003 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Brigham, G. S., Slesnick, N., Winhusen, T. M., Lewis, D. F., Guo, X., & Somoza, E. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.013 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Community Reinforcement and Family Training: A pilot comparison of group and self-directed delivery
Manuel, J. K., Austin, J. L., Miller, W. R., McCrady, B. S., Tonigan, J. S., Meyers, R. J., Smith, J. E., & Bogenschutz, M. P. (2012) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.020 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Kirby, K. C., Benishek, L. A., Kerwin, M. E., Dugosh, K. L., Carpenedo, C. M., Bresani, E., Haugh, J. A., Washio, Y., & Meyers, R. J. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000306 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT): An effectiveness study.
Dutcher, L. W., Anderson, R., Moore, M., Luna-Anderson, C., Meyers, R. J., Delaney, H. D., & Smith, J. E. (2009) · Journal of Behavior Analysis in Health, Sports, Fitness and Medicine · doi:10.1037/h0100376 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Nayoski, N., & Hodgins, D. C. (2016) · Journal of Gambling Issues · doi:10.4309/jgi.2016.33.11 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Osilla, K. C., Trail, T. E., Pedersen, E. R., Gore, K. L., Tolpadi, A., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12279 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Family-Based Intervention Program for Parents of Substance-Abusing Youth and Adolescents
Pons, D. B., Barrón, R. G., & Guijarro, Á. B. (2016) · Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1155/2016/4320720 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Campos-Melady, M., Smith, J. E., Meyers, R. J., Godley, S. H., & Godley, M. D. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000216 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Community Reinforcement Approach
Roozen, H. G., Meyers, R. J., & Smith, J. E. (2013) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-313-9756-3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Murphy, D., Palmer, E., Westwood, G., Busuttil, W., & Greenberg, N. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm5110095 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bischof G., 2013, Impact of motives on treatment outcomes for Concerned Significant Others supporting treatment‐seeking of addicts through Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT), Addiction Treatment, 14, 78
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A contextualized reinforcer pathology approach to addiction
Acuff, S. F., MacKillop, J. M., & Murphy, J. G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00167-y · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Hogue, A., Becker, S. J., Wenzel, K., Henderson, C. E., Bobek, M., Levy, S., & Fishman, M. (2021) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108402 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Couple and family therapy for substance use disorders: Evidence‐based update 2010–2019
Hogue, A., Schumm, J. A., MacLean, A., & Bobek, M. (2021) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12546 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Closing the treatment gap for alcohol use disorders in low- and middle-income countries
Nadkarni, A., Gandhi, Y., Bhatia, U., & Velleman, R. (2023) · Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health · doi:10.1017/gmh.2022.57 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Treatment for the concerned significant others of gamblers: A systematic review
Edgren, R., Pörtfors, P., Raisamo, S., & Castrén, S. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2021.00088 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Hogue, A., Bobek, M., Levy, S., Henderson, C. E., Fishman, M. J., Becker, S. J., Dauber, S. E., Porter, N., & Wenzel, K. R. (2021) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12499 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Hogue, A., Becker, S. J., Fishman, M. J., Henderson, C. E., & Levy, S. (2020) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108159 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Clinical neuroscience of addiction: what clinical psychologists need to know and why
Ray, L. A., & Grodin, E. N. (2021) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-114309 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Booth, N., Dowling, N., Landon, J., Lubman, D., Merkouris, S., & Rodda, S. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10040583 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
McCarthy, J. M., Wood, A. J., Shinners, M. G., Heinrich, H., Weiss, R. D., Mueser, K. T., Meyers, R. J., Carol, E. E., Hudson, J. I., & Öngür, D. (2022) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114804 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Hogue, A., Satcher, M. F., Drazdowski, T. K., Hagaman, A. M., Hibbard, P. F., Sheidow, A. J., Coetzer-Liversage, A., Mitchell, S. G., Watson, D. P., Wilson, K. J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209217 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Dowling, N. A., Hawker, C. O., Merkouris, S., Rodda, S. N., & Hodgins, D. C. (2025) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102542 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Hellum, R., Bilberg, R., Andersen, K., Bischof, G., Hesse, M., & Nielsen, A. S. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13293-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Treatment for the concerned significant others of gamblers : A systematic review
Edgren, R., Pörtfors, P., Raisamo, S. U., & Castrén, S. (2022) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · doi:10.48350/168493 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Evaluation of Community Reinforcement and Family Therapy in the UK military community
Croak, B., Archer, M., Harwood, H., Stevelink, S. A. M., Greenberg, N. L., & Rafferty, L. A. (2023) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2023.2282904 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationSiljeholm, O., Edvardsson, K., Bergström, M., & Hammarberg, A. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16429 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dowling, N. A., Hawker, C. O., Merkouris, S., Rodda, S. N., & Hodgins, D. C. (2025) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102543 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Siljeholm, O., Lindner, P., Johansson, M., & Hammarberg, A. (2022) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-022-00332-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Couple therapy and systemic interventions for adult‐focused problems: The evidence base
Carr, A. (2025) · Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12481 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A Call for Kindness, Connection, and Science
Lodge, B. S. (2022) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108839 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Slocum, S., Paquette, C. E., & Pollini, R. A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209023 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Timko, C., Grant, K. M., Han, X., Young, L. B., & Cucciare, M. A. (2021) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15670 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Functioning of adults in alcohol use disorder treatment: Role of concerned others
Timko, C., Grant, K. M., Mohankumar, R., & Cucciare, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108003 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Osilla, K. C., Manuel, J. K., Becker, K., Nameth, K., Burgette, L., Ober, A. J., DeYoreo, M., Lodge, B. S., Hurley, B., & Watkins, K. E. (2024) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209290 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Vassallo, M., DeGiovanni, K., & Montgomery, P. (2023) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-023-10220-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Siljeholm, O., & Ekström, V. (2023) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-023-00369-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hellum, R., Bilberg, R., Bischof, G., & Nielsen, A. S. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-198798/v1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dowling, N. A., Spence, K., Browne, M., Rockloff, M., & Merkouris, S. (2025) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-025-10377-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
From embedded interprofessional clinics to expanded alcohol-associated liver disease programs
Winder, G. S., Arab, J. P., Banerjee, A. G., Bryce, K., Fipps, D. C., Hussain, F., Im, G. Y., Omary, L., Patel, A., Patel, S. R., et al. (2025) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1097/lvt.0000000000000638 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Kuhn, E. R., Sayers, S. L., Babusci, C., Conroy, C., & Erbes, C. R. (2022) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22900 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Siljeholm, O., Eckerström, J., Molander, O., Sundbye, J., & Hammarberg, A. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05913-x · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Allan, J., Snowdon, N., Thapa, S., & Ahmed, K. Y. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05487-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Porter, N., Dunnsue, S., Hammond, C., MacLean, A., Bobek, M., Watkins, M., Ambrose, K., & Hogue, A. (2024) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209512 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Heiden‐Rootes, K. M., Meyer, D. D., Mancini, M. A., Ferber, M. F., Eikenberry, J., Wang, W., Rottnek, F., Jung, E., & Karir, S. V. (2023) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209024 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Halladay, J., Stead, V., McCarron, C., Kennedy, M., King, K., Venantius, M., Carter, A., Syan, S., Matthews, M., Khoshroo, S., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.10.21.22281362 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“CRAFT is commonly recommended in familyinvolvement calls to action (56, 57) as CRAFT has previously been shown to increase patient engagement in treatment (59, 60), improve family functioning (58, 60), reduce the patients’”
BackgroundHellum, R., Bilberg, R., & Nielsen, A. S. (2022) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12611 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Riley, B. J., Baigent, M. F., Battersby, M., & King, D. L. (2022) · Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12381 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Carias, A. R., & Granato, T. M. M. (2023) · Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) · doi:10.1590/1982-0275202340e200180 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Heukelom, J. T. V., Stinson, L. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2025) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100393 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Osilla, K. C., Gore, K. L., Pedersen, E. R., Hummer, J. F., DeYoreo, M., Manuel, J. K., McKay, J. R., Kim, J. P., & Nameth, K. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107324 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Rurality and readiness: Addressing substance use via a community‐level assessment
Cureton, J. L., Giegerich, V., & Ricciutti, N. M. (2022) · Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling · doi:10.1002/jaoc.12105 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bottel, L., Wildt, B. T. T., Brand, M., Pape, M., Herpertz, S., & Dieris-Hirche, J. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076221144185 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Addiction, P. T. E., & Hogue, A. (2023) · Addiction & Addictive Disorders · doi:10.24966/aad-7276/100144 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hellum, R., Bilberg, R., Mejldal, A., & Nielsen, A. S. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-17656-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Choi, J., Burgette, L. F., Nameth, K., Watkins, K. E., & Osilla, K. C. (2025) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2024.2417820 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Whitfield, M., Reed, H., Webster, J., & Hope, V. D. (2020) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15193 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Psychotherapeutic Support for Concerned Significant Others Impacted by Gambling Disorder
Anderson, N. S., & Ginley, M. K. (2025) · Journal of Health Service Psychology · doi:10.1007/s42843-025-00139-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
CRAFT: Treatment integrity is imperative for understanding research findings
Roozen, H. G., Tsuji, Y., & Meyers, R. J. (2020) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15195 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dowling, N. A., & Rodda, S. N. (2025) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2025.10.002 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Urgent response is needed to address the stimulant-fentanyl related overdose crisis
Mills, R., Jegede, O. O., & Muvvala, S. B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1769408 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT)
Hellum, R., Hammarberg, A., & Nielsen, A. S. (2025) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82583-5_19 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kommuners stöd för anhöriga till personer med substansbruksproblem
Fagerström, H., Skogens, L., & von Greiff, N. (2025) · Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift · doi:10.64098/svt.2025.32.1.61071 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Families’ perspectives on services’ responses to Australian children’s harmful sexual behaviours
McInnes, E., Ey, L.-A., & Tippett, N. (2026) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2026.2621869 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Family Perspectives on Stigma Toward Women Who Use Drugs in Tanzania
Saleem, H. T., Noon, K., Nwakama, C., Atkins, K., Snyder, A., Josaphat, E., Mbwambo, J., & Likindikoki, S. L. (2025) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840.2024.2445008 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Addressing barriers to addiction recovery services in the Northwest Territories, Canada
Denning, B., Broers, B., & Moffitt, P. M. (2025) · International Journal of Circumpolar Health · doi:10.1080/22423982.2025.2516872 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Substance Use in Early Psychosis: Mixed Methods Impact on Family
McCarthy, J. M., Foo, C. Y. S., Liew, M., Bianchi, E. N., Sultana, E., Weiss, R. D., & Mueser, K. T. (2025) · Journal of Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1080/15504263.2025.2557193 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yamamoto, A., & Roozen, H. G. (2025) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102608 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Gray, H., Ivory, N., Snowdon, N., Ahmed, K. Y., Thomas, M., & Allan, J. (2026) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2025.209867 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Supporting and Including Families in Professional Care for Alcohol Use
Velleman, R. D. B., Sequeira, M., & Bhatia, U. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18381-2_8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ueland, E., Nameth, K., Manuel, J. K., & Osilla, K. C. (2025) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2025.209628
Macky, J. P., Handley, C. J., Kirby, K. C., Fitzpatrick, B. G., Kishpaugh, J., West, C., Meyers, R. J., Bearnot, B. I., Herrera, A. E., Whitmarsh, E. H., et al. (2026) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2026.113225
Learning mechanisms of addiction
Yates, J. R. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90578-7.00009-8
Riley, B. J., Battersby, M., Baigent, M. F., & Smith, D. (2026) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-025-10468-x
Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders: First Wave Case Conceptualization
Roozen, H. G., & Smith, J. E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11677-3_23
Nuo blaivybės judėjimų iki įrodymais grįstos alkoholio politikos : Lietuvos atvejo vertinimas
Tamutienė, I., Civinskas, R., Stumbrys, D., Peištarė, B., & Auglytė, V. (2022) · doi:10.7220/9786094675287
Heiden‐Rootes, K. M., Meyer, D. D., Mancini, M. A., Ferber, M. F., Eikenberry, J., Wang, W., Rottnek, F., Jung, E., & Karir, S. V. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4163955
The evidence of a family-based treatment for adults who use psychotropic drugs in community setting
Luo, T., & Law, Y. W. (2026) · Social Work in Health Care · doi:10.1080/00981389.2026.2641427
Gray, H., Ivory, N. J., Snowdon, N., Ahmed, K. Y., Thomas, M., & Allan, J. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/qh8nxo
Siljeholm, O., & Hammarberg, A. (2025) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-025-00582-x
Thapa, S., Gray, H., Snowdon, N., Serna, B., Jacobson, B., & Allan, J. (2026) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2026.100416 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT)
Pylypciw, M., Sutherland, A., & Smith, J. E. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29009-1.00138-4
Ueland, E., Nameth, K., Manuel, J. K., & Osilla, K. C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4806554
Terapia de reforzamiento comunitario en el tratamiento del alcoholismo: una revisión sistemática
Hernández, F. A. A., & Ortiz, G. G. R. (2021) · Pro Sciences Revista de Producción Ciencias e Investigación · doi:10.29018/issn.2588-1000vol5iss41.2021pp209-229
Finding systemic responses to a world in crisis
Messent, P. (2022) · Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12411
Family Caregivers and Substance Use
Smith, J. E., Campos‐Melady, M., & Pacheco, C. R. (2025) · The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society · doi:10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs132.pub2
Kuhn, E. R., Sayers, S. L., Zimmerman, L. E., Mackintosh, M., Owen, J. E., Rosen, C. S., Meis, L. A., Hagedorn, H., & Erbes, C. R. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2025.107929
Rodriguez, L. M., Mohr, C. D., Nameth, K., Pedersen, E. R., & Osilla, K. C. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101495
Bortolon, C. B., Canfield, M., Padin, M. D. F. R., Orford, J., & Laranjeira, R. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22060968
Shah, K., Nameth, K., Choi, J., Burgette, L. F., & Osilla, K. C. (2025) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000001464
RESEARCH‐INFORMED PRACTICE IN COUPLE AND FAMILY THERAPY
(2026) · Family therapy · doi:10.1002/9781394337422.ch14
(2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3784847/v1
Lalane, M., & Thomas, A. A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57159-6_68-1
Owens, M. D., Adwell, A., Singh, S., Osilla, K. C., Tweedy, M., & Tsui, J. I. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07132-4
Bortolon, C. B., Canfield, M., Padin, M. D. F. R., Orford, J., & Laranjeira, R. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4594010/v1
- Authors
- Archer, M., Harwood, H., Stevelink, S., Rafferty, L., & Greenberg, N.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Greenberg, Neil
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1024-1037
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2990689052
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- crafts, treatment entry, concerned significant others, treatment engagement, gambling addiction, treatment options, therapist training, intervention fidelity, substance use disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Europe, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Reinforcement, Psychology, Behavior, Addictive, Spouses, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review