Cited by 61Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Efficacy of a single, brief alcohol reduction intervention among men and women living with HIV/AIDS and using alcohol in Kampala, Uganda: a randomized trial

Open access
Wandera, Bonnie, Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mbona, Nankabirwa, Joaniter Immaculate, Mafigiri, David Kaawa, Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind M., Kapiga, Saidi, Hahn, Judith, Sethi, Ajay K.·2017·Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention (MI) counseling in reducing alcohol consumption among persons living with HIV/AIDS in Kampala, Uganda. Persons living with HIV/AIDS with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tool (AUDIT) score ≥3 points were randomized to either standardized positive prevention counseling alone or in combination with alcohol brief MI counseling. The mean change in AUDIT-C scores over 6 months was compared by treatment arm. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) AUDIT-C scores were 6.3 (2.3) and 6.8 (2.3) for control and MI arms ( P = .1) at baseline, respectively, and change in mean AUDIT-C score was not statistically different between arms over the 6 months ( P = .8). However, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean AUDIT-C score (−1.10; 95% confidence interval: −2.19 to −0.02, P = .046) among women in the MI arm. There was a nondifferential reduction in alcohol consumption overall, but MI appeared effective among women only. Studies with more than 1 counseling session and evaluation of gender differences in treatment response are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2325957416649669

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies found no effect on total ASSIST scores.

    “Some studies found no effect on total Alcohol Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) scores [62,68], while others reported a statistically significant reduction in total ASSIST scores [49,69].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results (Change in alcohol consumption over time; page unavailable) report no significant difference between arms in mean AUDIT-C change over six months. The paper measured AUDIT-C, not total ASSIST scores, so it supports the no-between-arm-difference finding but not the stated outcome measure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some studies reported no intervention effect on alcohol use at month 6.

    “Other studies reported no intervention effect on alcohol use at month 3 [44], month 5 [58], month 6 [59,64,68] and month 12 [58,64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wandera, B., Tumwesigye, N. M., Nankabirwa, J. I., Mafigiri, D. K., Parkes-Ratanshi, R. M., Kapiga, S., Hahn, J., & Sethi, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Infectious Diseases Institute (UG)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Wandera, Bonnie
Venue
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
276-285
ISSN
  • 2325-9574 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-9582
OpenAlex
W2397194214
Cited by
61
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (087540)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/R00255X/1)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K24AA022586)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
alcohol consumption reduction, brief motivational interviewing, HIV/AIDS, people living with HIV, brief alcohol intervention, gender differences, women, AUDIT-C, alcoholism, Kampala, Uganda
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Uganda, HIV Infections, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review