Cited by 20Health and Well-being StudiesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Psychosocial modification of general self-efficacy in older adults: a restricted review

Open access
FitzGerald, Jarrah, Wells, Yvonne D., Ellis, Julie M.·2022·Australasian Journal on Ageing

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, the concept of general self-efficacy has increased in popularity. General self-efficacy is positively associated with quality of life and has the potential to act as a psychological buffer against adverse events and circumstances. However, due to the long-term influences that are said to shape general self-efficacy beliefs, they may be resistant to intervention, particularly within the older population. This restricted review aimed to explore whether psychosocial interventions could improve the general self-efficacy of older adults. Aspects of intervention design associated with improvements were also investigated. METHODS: A restricted review was undertaken. This included a keyword search of four major health databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AgeLine). Search terms focused on general self-efficacy and the commonly used measures of this concept and were limited to the older adult population. RESULTS: In total, 848 articles were screened, with 20 studies proceeding to data extraction. The modification of general self-efficacy in older adults appears possible, with 7 out of the 20 included studies reporting improvements postintervention. Despite issues relating to the quality of included studies and the generalisability of their results, several aspects of intervention design coincided with intervention success, including intervention duration, and employing sufficiently-qualified staff. CONCLUSIONS: Future research must address the generalisability issues identified in this review. Studies comparing the effectiveness of individual- and group-based interventions, the efficacy of remote delivery platforms and the possibility for long-term transfer of any improvements are needed to contribute the high-quality data required for policy and practice decisions in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajag.13052

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [58]Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self‐efficacy Scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio Causal and Control Beliefs; Windsor, UK: NFER‐NELSON; 1995: 35‐ 37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FitzGerald, J., Wells, Y. D., & Ellis, J. M.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
FitzGerald, Jarrah
Venue
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-02
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
e210-e226
ISSN
  • 0726-4240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-6381
  • 1741-6612
OpenAlex
W4214894010
Cited by
20
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal on Ageing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • La Trobe University
Funders
La Trobe University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
general self-efficacy, older adults, psychosocial interventions, intervention design, intervention duration, remote delivery, quality of life, psychological buffering
MeSH terms
Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Quality of Life, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review