Cited by 228Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryNursing care and researchHealth and Wellbeing Research

Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review: The role of self efficacy in patients with stroke

Korpershoek, Corrie, van der Bijl, Jaap, Hafsteinsdóttir, Thóra B.·2011·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

AIMS: To provide an overview of the literature focusing on the influence of self-efficacy and self-efficacy enhancing interventions on mobility, activities of daily living, depression and quality of life of patients with stroke. BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for the importance of self-efficacy in the care of people with enduring illness. Therefore, it is important to describe the association of self-efficacy and patient outcomes and the evidence for the effects of self-efficacy interventions for stroke patients. DATA SOURCES: Studies were retrieved from a systematic search of published studies over the period of 1996-2009, indexed in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, Psychinfo and Embase and focusing on stroke, the influence of self-efficacy and self-efficacy enhancing interventions. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out. Studies were critically appraised and important characteristics and outcomes were extracted and summarized. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were included in the review. Self-efficacy was positively associated with mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life and negatively associated with depression. Four self-efficacy interventions were identified. The evidence for the effects of these interventions was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high self-efficacy are functioning better in daily activities than patients with low self-efficacy. The evidence concerning the determinants influencing self-efficacy and the self-efficacy interventions makes clear how nurses can develop and tailor self-efficacy interventions for the clinical practice of people with stroke. Therefore, it is necessary to further emphasize the role of self-efficacy in the care for stroke patients in the nursing curriculum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05659.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korpershoek, C., van der Bijl, J., & Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-07
Volume
67
Issue
9
Pages
1876-1894
ISSN
0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170503679
Cited by
228
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
self-efficacy, stroke, self-efficacy intervention, mobility (physical function), activities of daily living, depression, quality of life, stroke rehabilitation, nursing care, nursing curriculum
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Humans, Quality of Life, Research Design, Nursing Research, Treatment Outcome, Rehabilitation Nursing, Self Efficacy, Stroke, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review