Cited by 92Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Improving Mental Health and Well‐Being through Informal Mindfulness Practices: An Intervention Study

Shankland, Rebecca, Tessier, Damien, Strub, Lionel, Gauchet, Aurélie, Baeyens, Céline·2021·Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness‐based programs have been shown to be effective in reducing stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms, and enhancing well‐being. However, it remains unclear whether longer formal mindfulness practices are necessary to obtain such results. We therefore aimed to assess the effectiveness of a program (FOVEA, 8 weeks, 2h/week) which was only based on brief and informal practices. Methods: Using a switching replication design, participants ( N = 139) were assigned to a FOVEA or a wait‐list group, and completed the following self‐report questionnaires online at three time points: perceived stress, anxiety, depression, satisfaction with life (dependent variables), and mindfulness (mediating variable). They also completed a daily practice diary. Results: Relative to the wait‐list group, FOVEA participants showed significantly reduced perceived stress, anxiety, and depression, and increased satisfaction with life. These changes were completely mediated by increased mindfulness, and were maintained 2.5 months after the end of the program. The effect sizes were moderate to large. Conclusions: These results underline the potential benefits of a mindfulness informal practices program for the general population. This type of program could constitute a first step towards more formal practices once the motivation to practice has been enhanced by the perceived benefits of brief practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aphw.12216

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shankland, R., Tessier, D., Strub, L., Gauchet, A., & Baeyens, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France
  • Sport et environnement social (FR)
  • Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
  • Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Venue
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-26
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
63-83
ISSN
  • 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-0854
OpenAlex
W3080134393
Cited by
92
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Communauté Université Grenoble Alpes (PRS‐LIP/PC2S‐2014)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
perceived stress, anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, mindfulness, mediation, well-being, general population
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review