Cited by 539Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Patient Involvement

Self-stigma, empowerment and perceived discrimination among people with schizophrenia in 14 European countries: The GAMIAN-Europe study

Brohan, Elaine, Elgie, Rodney, Sartorius, Norman, Thornicroft, Graham·2010·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

There is a growing interest in examining self-stigma as a barrier to recovery from schizophrenia. To date, no studies have examined mental health service user's experiences of self-stigma throughout Europe. This study describes the level of self-stigma, stigma resistance, empowerment and perceived discrimination reported by mental health service users with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder across 14 European countries. Data were collected from 1229 people using a postal survey from members of mental health non-governmental organisations. Almost half (41.7%) reported moderate or high levels of self-stigma, 49.2% moderate or high stigma resistance, 49.7% moderate or high empowerment and 69.4% moderate or high perceived discrimination. In a reduced multivariate model 42% of the variance in self-stigma scores was predicted by levels of empowerment, perceived discrimination and social contact. These results suggest that self-stigma appears to be common and sometimes severe among people with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1065

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brohan, E., Elgie, R., Sartorius, N., & Thornicroft, G.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Global Alliance of Mental Illness Advocacy Networks-Europe (BE)
Corresponding author
Brohan, Elaine
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
122
Issue
1-3
Pages
232-238
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982540987
Cited by
539
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 18
FWCI
34.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
self-stigma, stigma resistance
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Discrimination, Psychological, Europe, Female, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Power, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Stereotyping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review