Cited by 7Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesSchool Health and Nursing EducationGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

“It's like an epidemic, we don't know what to do”: The perceived need for and benefits of a suicide prevention programme in UK schools

Open access
Ashworth, Emma, Thompson, Joniece, Saini, Pooja·2024·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Background: Despite emerging evidence for the effectiveness of school‐based suicide prevention programmes worldwide, there are few being implemented in the United Kingdom, and their social validity (i.e., the feasibility, acceptability, and utility) is not yet known. Aims: We aimed to conduct a scoping study to determine: (1) the social validity and potential benefits of school‐based suicide prevention interventions, (2) the perceived need for such interventions, and (3) barriers and facilitators to implementation. Sample and Methods: A total of 46 participants took part. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with mental health professionals ( N = 8), school staff ( N = 8), and parents whose children had experienced suicidal ideation/behaviours ( N = 3) in England. Focus groups were also completed with children and young people ( N = 27) aged 15–18 across three state secondary schools. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis. Results: Three themes were identified: (1) the need for and importance of suicide prevention in children and young people, (2) schools as a setting for delivery, and (3) key components of suicide prevention programmes. Conclusions: Participants overwhelmingly agreed that there is a need for a greater and more consistent emphasis on school‐based suicide prevention. School appears to be an acceptable location for suicide prevention, and participants felt discussions about suicide should begin at the start of secondary school. However, there are potential barriers that need to be considered, including tailoring for neurodiversity, challenging cultural/family beliefs and stigma, managing personal experiences of suicidal thoughts or previous bereavement from suicide, and a lack of existing training for school staff.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjep.12683

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the scoping study, all participants advocated the importance of school-based suicide prevention and gave feedback on changes needed to adapt MAPSS for the UK.

    “All participants advocated the importance of school-based suicide prevention and gave feedback on the changes needed to adapt the MAPSS intervention for the UK.”

    From Study protocol for the Multimodal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) project: A regionally based feasibility trial of an integrated response to suicide risk among UK secondary school pupils (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Conclusions report that participants saw an urgent need for more school-based suicide prevention, but the Abstract says they 'overwhelmingly agreed,' not that every participant advocated it. The Data collection and Discussion sections describe feedback on interventions and recommendations for UK schools; they do not identify that feedback as changes needed to adapt MAPSS specifically. Our copy gives no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent scoping study of MAPSS for UK schools interviewed children and young people, school staff, parents, and health professionals.

    “A recent scoping study of MAPSS for UK schools [18, 19] interviewed CYP, school staff, parents, and health professionals.”

    From Study protocol for the Multimodal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) project: A regionally based feasibility trial of an integrated response to suicide risk among UK secondary school pupils (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods (Design and setting) describe a UK scoping study with interviews of mental health professionals, parents and school staff, plus focus groups with children and young people. The study explored school-based suicide prevention interventions generally, not MAPSS specifically. The paper describes MAPSS separately as a project being trialled in Melbourne, Australia (Keywords section). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Calear, A., Brewer, J., Batterham, P., Mackinnon, A., Wyman, P., LoMurray, M., Shand, F., Kazan, D., & Christensen, H. (2016). The sources of strength Australia project: Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 17(349), 1-12. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s1306 3-016-1475-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chiodo, D., & Kolpin, H. (2018). Both promising and problematic: Reviewing the evidence for implementation science. In Handbook of school-based mental health promotion (pp. 11-31). Springer.
  3. Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University Press.
  4. Gijzen, M. W. M., Rasing, S. P. A., Creemers, D. H. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Smit, F. (2022). Effectiveness of school-based preventive programs in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 298(PA), 408-420. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jad. 2021. 10. 062 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hawton, K., Saunders, K. E., & O'Connor, R. C. (2012). Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. The Lancet, 379(9834), 2373-2382. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140 -6736(12) 60322 -5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N. (2020). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Predicting what will work locally. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1045-1082. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3102/ 00028 31219 866687 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Patalay, P., & Fitzsimons, E. (2021). Psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide in UK 17-year olds: Prevalence and sociodemographic inequalities. British Journal of Psychiatry, 219(2), 437-439. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1192/ bjp. 2020. 258 · DOI
  8. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In B. Bryman & R. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173-194). Routledge.
  9. Shucksmith, J., Jones, S., & Summerbell, C. (2010). The role of parental involvement in school-based mental health interventions at primary (elementary) school level. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 3(1), 18-29. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17547 30X. 2010. 9715671 · DOI
  10. Stephan, H., Weist, M., Kataoka, S., Adelsheim, S., & Mills, C. (2007). Transformation of children's mental health services: The role of school mental health. Journal of Psychatric Services, 58(10), 1255-1384. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1939-0025. 1965. tb042 · DOI
  11. x Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item check- list for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ intqhc/ mzm042 · DOI · Paper page
  12. van Vuuren, C. L., van der Wal, M. F., Cuijpers, P., & Chinapaw, M. J. M. (2021). Are suicidal thoughts and behaviors a tempo- rary phenomenon in early adolescence? Crisis, 42(1), 78-81. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1027/ 0227-5910/ a000680 · DOI
  13. Walsh, E. H., McMahon, J., & Herring, M. P. (2022). Research review: The effect of school-based suicide prevention on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts and the role of intervention and contextual factors among adolescents: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of Child Psycholog y and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 63(8), 836-845. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jcpp. 13598 · DOI
  14. Wang, X., Zhao, J., Huang, S., Chen, S., Zhou, T., Li, Q., Luo, X., & Hao, Y. (2021). Cognitive behavioral therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 147(5), e2020049880. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2020-049880 · DOI
  15. Wasserman, D., Hoven, C. W., Wasserman, C., Wall, M., Eisenberg, R., Hadlaczky, G., Kelleher, I., Sarchiapone, M., Apter, A., Balazs, J., Bobes, J., Brunner, R., Corcoran, P., Cosman, D., Guillemin, F., Haring, C., Iosue, M., Kaess, M., Kahn, J. P., … Carli, V. (2015). School-based suicide prevention programmes: The SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1536-1544. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140 -6736(14) 61213 -7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Wolf, M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 1311293. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1901/ jaba. 1978. 11-203 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashworth, E., Thompson, J., & Saini, P.
Affiliations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ashworth, Emma
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-21
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
824-838
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W4393091982
Cited by
7
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
school-based suicide prevention, suicide prevention programs, social validity, implementation barriers and facilitators, adolescents, secondary schools, suicidal ideation, stigma, neurodiversity, school staff training, children and young people
MeSH terms
School Mental Health Services, Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, School Health Services, Schools, Qualitative Research, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review