Cited by 464Technology Adoption and User BehaviourBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: a customer perspective approach

Albayati, Hayder, Kim, Suk Kyoung, Rho, Jae Jeung·2020·Technology in Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Albayati, Hayder
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
62
Pages
101320
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039329299
Cited by
464
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 4
FWCI
53.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
blockchain, cryptocurrency, technology acceptance, consumer trust, regulatory support, user experience, social influence, technology adoption, fintech, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, financial transactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review