The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
The COVID‐19 pandemic situation has pushed many higher education institutions into a fast‐paced, and mostly unstructured, emergency remote education process. In such an unprecedented context, it is important to understand how technology is mediating the educational process and how teachers and students are experiencing the change brought by the pandemic. This research aims to understand how the learning was mediated by technology during the early stages of the pandemic and how students and teachers experienced this sudden change. Data were collected following a qualitative research design. Thirty in‐depth and semi‐structured interviews (20 students and 10 teachers) were obtained and analysed following a thematic analysis approach. Results provide evidence on the adoption of remote education technologies due to the pandemic with impacts on the education process, ICT platforms usage and personal adaptation. The emergency remote education context led to mixed outcomes regarding the education process. Simultaneously, ICT platforms usage was mostly a positive experience and personal adaptation was mostly a negative experience. These results bring new insights for higher education organizations on actions they could take, such as curating the learning experience with standard, institutional‐wide platforms, appropriate training for students and teachers, and suitable remote evaluation practices. Practitioner notes: What is already known about this topic The COVID‐19 pandemic has pushed the world's education environment into an unstructured, emergency remote education process. There is a lack of understanding of how ICT tools mediated learning during pandemic's early stages and how actors experienced this sudden change. In technology‐mediated learning contexts, participant beliefs, knowledge, practices and the environment mutually influence one another and affect the lived experience. What this paper adds The paper identifies and characterizes the educational process, the technological tools used in this new educational setting and personal adaptation of higher education students and teachers during these unprecedented times. The results show the following: an increase in teacher–student interaction (outside classes), new opportunities and content development; difficulties in control evaluation fraud, constraints in attaining the desired learning outcomes and lack of training; resilience to adapt and adopt the new technologies, despite the negative personal experience lived in terms of productivity, motivation, workload and mental health. Implications for practice and/or policy The paper makes evidence‐based recommendations on how higher education institutions can leverage this experience to prepare for future disruptions and increase the use of ICT tools in their regular learning environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Ren, R., Leung, K. S. M., Lau, E. H. Y., Wong, J. Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001316 · Cited by 16,575
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136 · cited 1×
“…on the participants' views of the situation” (Creswell, 2013, p. 24), guided by a flexible interview protocol that allows the researchers to collect open-ended data and explore participant thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the topic (Cohen et al., 2018; Corbin & Strauss, 2008; Creswell, 2013).”
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012) · APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. · doi:10.1037/13620-004 · Cited by 10,299
The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2024) · Handbook of Research in Online Learning · doi:10.1163/9789004702813_021 · Cited by 6,253
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315456539 · Cited by 6,018
Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis
Dhawan, S. (2020) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239520934018 · Cited by 5,083
Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732316654870 · Cited by 3,970
Goodman, L. A. (1961) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705148 · Cited by 3,606
Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 · Cited by 2,729
Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701 · Cited by 1,472
Cited by
Swed, S., Alibrahim, H., Elkalagi, N. K. H., Nasif, M. N., Rais, M. A., Nashwan, A. J., Aljabali, A., Elsayed, M., Sawaf, B., Albuni, M. K., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.1011524 · Cited by 185
Karakose, T., Demirkol, M., Aslan, N., Köse, H., & Yirci, R. (2023) · Educational Process International Journal · doi:10.22521/edupij.2023.123.1 · Cited by 65
A review of the changes in higher education assessment and grading policy during covid-19
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2140780 · Cited by 44
Cook, H., Apps, T., Beckman, K., & Bennett, S. (2023) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10194-4 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1357-1376
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W3163886146
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 149.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjet.13112
- The paper
- Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.