Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecological and evolutionary legacy of megafauna extinctions

Galetti, Mauro, Moleón, Marcos, Jordano, Pedro, Pires, Mathias M., Guimarães, Paulo R., Pape, Thomas, Nichols, Elizabeth, Hansen, Dennis, Olesen, Jens M., Munk, Michael, de Mattos, Jacqueline S., Schweiger, Andreas H., Owen‐Smith, Norman, Johnson, Christopher N., Marquis, Robert J., Svenning, Jens‐Christian·2018·Biological Reviews

Abstract

For hundreds of millions of years, large vertebrates (megafauna) have inhabited most of the ecosystems on our planet. During the late Quaternary, notably during the Late P leistocene and the early H olocene, Earth experienced a rapid extinction of large, terrestrial vertebrates. While much attention has been paid to understanding the causes of this massive megafauna extinction, less attention has been given to understanding the impacts of loss of megafauna on other organisms with whom they interacted. In this review, we discuss how the loss of megafauna disrupted and reshaped ecological interactions, and explore the ecological consequences of the ongoing decline of large vertebrates. Numerous late Quaternary extinct species of predators, parasites, commensals and mutualistic partners were associated with megafauna and were probably lost due to their strict dependence upon them (co‐extinctions). Moreover, many extant species have megafauna‐adapted traits that provided evolutionary benefits under past megafauna‐rich conditions, but are now of no or limited use (anachronisms). Morphological evolution and behavioural changes allowed some of these species partially to overcome the absence of megafauna. Although the extinction of megafauna led to a number of co‐extinction events, several species that likely co‐evolved with megafauna established new interactions with humans and their domestic animals. Species that were highly specialized in interactions with megafauna, such as large predators, specialized parasites, and large commensalists (e.g. scavengers, dung beetles), and could not adapt to new hosts or prey were more likely to die out. Partners that were less megafauna dependent persisted because of behavioural plasticity or by shifting their dependency to humans via domestication, facilitation or pathogen spill‐over, or through interactions with domestic megafauna. We argue that the ongoing extinction of the extant megafauna in the Anthropocene will catalyse another wave of co‐extinctions due to the enormous diversity of key ecological interactions and functional roles provided by the megafauna.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/brv.12374

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If megafauna were important to ecosystem structure and function, their extinction probably initiated ecological cascades (legacy effects) that persist until modern times.

    “If megafauna were important to ecosystem structure and function, their extinction probably initiated ecological cascades (legacy effects) that persist until modern times [81,82].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 215

  1. 10.1126/science.1059342 · DOI
  2. Alvarenga H., 2008, Pleistovultur nevesi gen. et sp. nov. (Aves: Vulturidae) y la diversidad de cóndores y buitres en el Pleistoceno de América del Sur, Ameghiniana, 45, 613
  3. Alvarenga H., 2004, A new genus of tiny condor from the Pleistocene of Brazil, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 117, 1
  4. 10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/3933 · DOI
  6. Araujo A., 2015, Sanitation, Latrines and Intestinal Parasites in Past Populations, 165
  7. 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.045 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139225 · DOI
  9. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12181.x · DOI
  10. Atkinson I. A., 1989, Relationships between moas and plants, New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 12, 67
  11. Baker M. K., 1970, Checklist of the ticks found on the larger game animals in the Natal game reserves, Lammergeyer, 12, 41
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003972 · DOI
  13. Barlow C., 2002, Nonsensical fruit, missing partners, and other ecological anachronisms
  14. 10.1126/science.1101476 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1017/S0030605314000878 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.041 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/sciadv.1501105 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00512.x · DOI
  19. 10.1093/jmammal/gyu002 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15076.x · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12720.x · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0414 · DOI
  23. 10.1656/058.014.0109 · DOI
  24. Brauer F. M., 1884, Entomologische beiträge, Verhandlungen der Zoologisch‐Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 34, 269
  25. 10.2307/1933346 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056252 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/bij.12181 · DOI
  28. Cambefort Y., 1982, Les coleopteres Scarabaeidae s. str. de Lamto (Cote‐d'Ivoire): structure des peuplements et role dans l'ecosysteme, Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 18, 433, 10.1080/21686351.1982.12278333 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/02724634.1981.10011901 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0874:ESOAAU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  32. 10.1098/rspb.2014.2095 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.12.009 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0508529102 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/geb.12346 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/2390087 · DOI
  37. 10.1017/S0266467403003638 · DOI
  38. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01701.x · DOI
  39. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160304 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/BF01036753 · DOI
  41. Cooper W., 1994, Fruits of the Rain Forest: A Guide to Fruits in Australian Tropical Rain Forests
  42. 10.1007/s12228-012-9248-y · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.004 · DOI
  44. 10.1894/0038-4909(2003)048<0597:LPBFAC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/btp.12052 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.0803232105 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/ecog.01587 · DOI
  48. 10.2307/1311214 · DOI
  49. Engel T. R., 2000, Seed Dispersal and Forest Regeneration in A Tropical Lowland Biocoenosis (Shimba Hills)
  50. 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.10.001 · DOI
  51. 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085622 · DOI
  52. 10.1086/654850 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/ddi.12369 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1073/pnas.1523825113 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02072-3 · DOI
  56. 10.1130/G22571.1 · DOI
  57. 10.1163/187631281794709728 · DOI
  58. 10.1046/j.1365-2028.2002.00385.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.020 · DOI
  60. 10.1126/science.1233774 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1002/fee.1431 · DOI
  62. 10.1006/jhev.1999.0325 · DOI
  63. 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.228.01.19 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.015 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/boj.12420 · DOI
  66. 10.7208/chicago/9780226156941.001.0001 · DOI
  67. 10.1600/036364415X686558 · DOI
  68. Grant R., 1998, Sappi Tree Spotting: KwazuluNatal, Coast and Midlands: Tree Identification Made Easy
  69. Grant R., 2001, Sappi tree Spotting: Lowveld, Including Kruger National Park: Tree Identification Made Easy
  70. Greenwood R., 1977, Evolution of divaricating plants in New Zealand in relation to moa browsing, Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society, 24, 21
  71. Grunin K., 1973, The first discovery of larvae of the mammoth bot‐fly Cobboldia (Mamontia, subgen. n.) russanovi sp. n.(Diptera, Gasterophilidae), Éntomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 52, 228
  72. Guimarães J., 1999, Myiasis in man and animals in the Neotropical Region: Bibliographic database
  73. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00081.x · DOI
  74. 10.1371/journal.pone.0153570 · DOI
  75. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028447 · DOI
  76. 10.3732/ajb.1200115 · DOI
  77. 10.1126/science.1172393 · DOI
  78. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002111 · DOI
  79. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01239.x · DOI
  80. 10.7589/2013-03-048 · DOI
  81. 10.1086/283845 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.045 · DOI
  83. 10.3389/fevo.2015.00148 · DOI
  84. 10.1111/brv.12145 · DOI
  85. 10.2307/1939431 · DOI
  86. Holdaway R. N., 1989, New Zealand's pre‐human avifauna and its vulnerability, New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 12, 11
  87. 10.1126/science.287.5461.2250 · DOI
  88. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094021 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.02.037 · DOI
  90. 10.1086/284383 · DOI
  91. 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2009.01089.x · DOI
  92. 10.3161/15081109ACC2016.18.2.017 · DOI
  93. 10.1073/pnas.1205184109 · DOI
  94. 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.003115 · DOI
  95. 10.1126/science.215.4528.19 · DOI
  96. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1921 · DOI
  97. 10.1126/science.aam9317 · DOI
  98. 10.1073/pnas.0711140105 · DOI
  99. 10.1086/686094 · DOI
  100. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0575 · DOI
  101. 10.1073/pnas.1516109112 · DOI
  102. 10.7208/chicago/9780226027524.001.0001 · DOI
  103. 10.7589/0090-3558-33.3.492 · DOI
  104. 10.1023/A:1018439614008 · DOI
  105. Kryger U., 2006, Biology and ecology of Circellium bacchus (Fabricius 1781) (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae), a South African dung beetle of conservation concern, Tropical Zoology, 19, 185
  106. Kurtén B., 1973, Pleistocene jaguars in North America
  107. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02615-0 · DOI
  108. 10.1080/10420940600843641 · DOI
  109. Lindroth R. L., 1989, Plant‐Animal Interactions, 163
  110. Lorenzi H., 1998, Árvores brasileiras. Manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas do Brasil
  111. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.07.011 · DOI
  112. 10.1086/283953 · DOI
  113. 10.1007/BF00317789 · DOI
  114. 10.1073/pnas.1502540113 · DOI
  115. Marquis R. J., 1992, Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens, 301
  116. Martin F. M., 2016, Cueva del Milodón. The hunting grounds of the Patagonian panther, Quaternary International
  117. 10.1126/science.179.4077.969 · DOI · Paper page
  118. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5202-1_2 · DOI
  119. 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00541.x · DOI
  120. 10.1111/ddi.12330 · DOI
  121. 10.1079/9780851995250.0381 · DOI
  122. 10.2307/1378876 · DOI
  123. McNaughton S. J., 1984, Herbivory ‐ the dynamics of animal‐plant interactions, American Scientist, 72, 301
  124. 10.1073/pnas.1113788109 · DOI
  125. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011412 · DOI
  126. Midgley J. J., 2009, Were Malagasy Uncarina fruits dispersed by the extinct elephant bird?, South African Journal of Science, 105, 467
  127. 10.1186/1756-3305-4-71 · DOI
  128. 10.1016/0033-5894(83)90067-4 · DOI
  129. 10.1016/j.ijpp.2013.08.003 · DOI
  130. 10.1111/oik.02222 · DOI
  131. Morgan G., 1988, New species of fossil vampire bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Desmodontidae) from Florida, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 101, 912
  132. 10.1111/1365-2745.12517 · DOI
  133. 10.1007/s10531-006-9050-9 · DOI
  134. 10.1080/0028825X.2015.1064974 · DOI
  135. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.08.003 · DOI
  136. 10.1002/9781444342000.ch13 · DOI
  137. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17268.x · DOI
  138. 10.1038/nature21347 · DOI · Paper page
  139. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.12.020 · DOI
  140. 10.1642/AUK-15-74.1 · DOI
  141. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00246.x · DOI
  142. 10.1126/science.1151579 · DOI
  143. 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.12.035 · DOI
  144. 10.1079/9780851996844.0020 · DOI
  145. Pape T., 2009, Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools
  146. 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00067-5 · DOI
  147. Peres C. A., 1996, Ungulate ectoparasite removal by Black Caracaras and Pale‐winged Trumpeters in Amazonian forests, The Wilson Bulletin, 108, 170
  148. 10.1073/pnas.1516525113 · DOI · Paper page
  149. 10.1038/srep24820 · DOI
  150. Pires M. M., 2013, Interaction intimacy organizes networks of antagonistic interactions in different ways, Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  151. Pires M. M., 2017, Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions and the functional loss of long‐distance seed dispersal services, Ecography, 40, 1
  152. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1367 · DOI
  153. 10.1007/BF02118433 · DOI
  154. Pollard A. J., 1992, Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics, 216
  155. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00317.x · DOI
  156. 10.1086/393500 · DOI
  157. 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.12.039 · DOI
  158. 10.1126/science.11542060 · DOI
  159. Rhodin A. Thomson S. Georgalis G. Karl H.‐V. Danilov I. Takahashi A. de laFuente M. Bourque J. Delfino M. Bour R. Iverson J. Shaffer B.&vanDijk P. P.(2015).Turtles and tortoises of the world during the rise and global spread of humanity: first checklist and review of extinct pleistocene and holocene chelonians. · DOI
  160. Rich P. V., 1983, Vulture Biology and Management, 3
  161. 10.1080/02724634.2015.1113803 · DOI
  162. 10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.7 · DOI
  163. 10.1126/science.1060264 · DOI
  164. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.05.028 · DOI
  165. 10.1098/rspb.2013.3254 · DOI · Paper page
  166. 10.1525/auk.2011.11144 · DOI
  167. 10.2307/1379959 · DOI
  168. 10.2307/1381050 · DOI
  169. 10.1111/mec.12576 · DOI
  170. Short J., 1981, Diet and feeding behaviour of the forest elephant, Mammalia, 45, 177, 10.1515/mamm.1981.45.2.177 · DOI
  171. Sick H., 1997, Ornitologia Brasileira
  172. 10.1111/ecog.02156 · DOI
  173. 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002303 · DOI
  174. Steadman D. W., 2006, Extinction and Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds
  175. 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00116-2 · DOI
  176. 10.1002/ecy.1799 · DOI
  177. 10.1111/1365-2664.12690 · DOI
  178. 10.1007/s00442-015-3319-1 · DOI
  179. 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.08.007 · DOI
  180. 10.1038/ncomms2723 · DOI
  181. 10.1080/02541858.1981.11447731 · DOI
  182. 10.2988/0006-324X-127.2.299 · DOI
  183. 10.1073/pnas.1502556112 · DOI
  184. 10.7717/peerj.1988 · DOI
  185. Thomas V., 2004, Sappi Tree Spotting: Kwazulu‐Natal and Eastern Cape
  186. 10.1007/s10682-011-9470-1 · DOI
  187. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014308 · DOI
  188. 10.1098/rspb.2012.0535 · DOI
  189. 10.1016/S0016-6995(96)80005-2 · DOI
  190. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.030 · DOI
  191. Tyrberg T., 2008, The Late Pleistocene continental avian extinction: an evaluation of the fossil evidence, Oryctos, 7, 249
  192. 10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_16 · DOI
  193. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01108.x · DOI
  194. 10.1073/pnas.1502554112 · DOI
  195. Van Wyk B., 1997, Field Guide to Trees of Southern Africa
  196. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.04.017 · DOI
  197. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00992.x · DOI
  198. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01252.x · DOI
  199. 10.2307/3543890 · DOI
  200. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02561.x · DOI

200 of 215 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Galetti, M., Moleón, M., Jordano, P., Pires, M. M., Guimarães, P. R., Pape, T., Nichols, E., Hansen, D., Olesen, J. M., Munk, M., de Mattos, J. S., Schweiger, A. H., Owen‐Smith, N., Johnson, C. N., Marquis, R. J., & Svenning, J.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) 13506‐900 Rio Claro SP Brazil
  • Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD‐SCIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Sevilla Spain
  • Departamento de Ecologia Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo SP Brazil
  • Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
  • Biology Department Swarthmore College Swarthmore PA U.S.A.
  • Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich 8057 Zurich Switzerland
  • Section for Ecoinformatics &amp; Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience Aarhus University 8000 Aarhus C Denmark
  • Centre for African Ecology, School of Animal Plant and Environmental Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Wits 2050 South Africa
  • School of Biological Sciences &amp; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia
  • Department of Biology and the Whitney R. Harris World Ecology Center University of Missouri‐St. Louis St. Louis U.S.A.
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-09
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
845-862
ISSN
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
Cited by
274
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Villum Fonden
  • Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review