CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests

Peres, Carlos A., Emilio, Thaise, Schietti, Juliana, Desmoulière, Sylvain J. M., Levi, Taal·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1516525113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Significance: A standardized network of wildlife surveys across 166 Amazonian hunted and nonhunted forests, combined with basin-wide spatial modeling of central-place hunting pressure, reveal the degree to which arboreal frugivores have been extirpated by hunters and the spatial extent of overhunting for harvest-sensitive frugivore species across the Brazilian Amazon. Simulations based on data from 2,345 1-ha tree plots inventoried throughout Brazilian Amazonia then show widespread erosion of forest carbon stocks in the world’s largest tropical forest region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1516525113

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in forest composition that occurred in the absence of major fire or forest opening events may be a part of natural forest dynamics or an indirect effect of hunting activities.

    “Changes in forest composition that occurred in the absence of major fire or forest opening events may be a part of natural forest dynamics or an indirect effect of hunting activities”

    From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as Peres et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.5194/essd-5-165-2013 · DOI
  2. CA Peres, Mv Roosmalen, Patterns of primate frugivory in Amazonia and the Guianan shield: Implications to the demography of large-seeded plants in overhunted tropical forests. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, eds D Levey, W Silva, M Galetti (CABI International, Oxford), pp. 407–423 (2002).
  3. 10.2307/2399084 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/1311860 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.007 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00123-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01413.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.11 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00293.x · DOI
  10. 10.1890/08-0955.1 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00630.x · DOI
  12. 10.1098/rspb.2013.0246 · DOI
  13. 10.1890/14-1735.1 · DOI
  14. 10.1890/07-0479.1 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1117682 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00471.x · DOI
  17. 10.5194/bg-6-297-2009 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01485.x · DOI
  19. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3197:CCDADI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.actao.2008.04.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/aob/mcl066 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.326_364b · DOI
  23. 10.3732/ajb.94.3.451 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1205184109 · DOI
  25. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.01089.x · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00590.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.032 · DOI
  28. 10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.1243092 · DOI · Paper page
  31. MG van Roosmalen Fruits of the Guianan Flora (Utrecht University, Wageningen Agricultural University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1985).
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01661.x · DOI
  33. 10.1890/10-0375.1 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nature12914 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/ncomms4434 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00092.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.005 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00276.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00359.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.021 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/35041539 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/ngeo1741 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nature14283 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1126/science.1164033 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nature07771 · DOI
  46. 10.1098/rstb.2007.0013 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.002 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00289.x · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1504869112 · DOI
  50. 10.1890/05-0386 · DOI
  51. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000331 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.0913048107 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1080/17583004.2014.990680 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peres, C. A., Emilio, T., Schietti, J., Desmoulière, S. J. M., & Levi, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom;
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil;
  • Fiocruz Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil;
  • Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-01-25
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
892-897
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1516525113
Cited by
337
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review