Cited by 147Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Movements and Cultural Identity

Sociocultural Influences on the Sociopolitical Development of African American Youth

Anyiwo, Nkemka, Bañales, Josefina, Rowley, Stephanie J, Watkins, Daphne C, Richards-Schuster, Katie·2018·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

Abstract Sociopolitical development (SPD) is the process by which individuals become aware of social inequality, recognize the status of their social identities, and engage in activism. For racially marginalized youth, race is an important aspect of their SPD. Yet few studies have considered the connections between racial factors and youth's SPD. In this article, we introduce an integrative model situating racial sociocultural processes (i.e., racial identity, racial socialization, and experiences of racial discrimination) within current SPD theory. In particular, we look at African American youth as a case study to discuss how sociocultural factors can contribute to youth's awareness of structures of social inequality (i.e., critical social analysis) and engagement in action against social inequality (i.e., sociopolitical action). We conclude with suggestions for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdep.12276

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of camaraderie among marginalized youth may enhance marginalized youth's understanding of systemic inequalities and increase their engagement in activism to fight against shared oppression.

    “The development of camaraderie among marginalized youth, in particular, may enhance marginalized youth's understanding of systemic inequalities and increase their engagement in activism to fight against shared oppression [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anyiwo, N., Bañales, J., Rowley, S. J., Watkins, D. C., & Richards-Schuster, K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Anyiwo, Nkemka
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2018-08-03
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
165-170
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W2783914387
Cited by
147
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8
FWCI
26.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE1256260)
  • Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
socio-political development, African American youth, racial identity, racial socialization, racial discrimination, social inequality, activism, critical social analysis, sociopolitical action, racial marginalization, sociocultural factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review