Cited by 45Stress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Burnout

Work‐related stress in a humanitarian context: a qualitative investigation.

Open access
Jachens, Liza, Houdmont, Jonathan, Thomas, Roslyn·2018·Disasters

Abstract

There is a paucity of research on the subjective stress-related experiences of humanitarian aid workers. Most evaluations of stress among these individuals focus on trauma and related conditions or adopt a quantitative approach. This interview-based study explored how 58 humanitarian aid workers employed by a United Nations-aligned organisation perceived the transactional stress process. The thematic analysis revealed eight main topics of interest: an emergency culture was found where most employees felt compelled to offer an immediate response to humanitarian needs; employees identified strongly with humanitarian goals and reported a high level of engagement; the rewards of humanitarian work were perceived as motivating and meaningful; constant change and urgent demands resulted in work overload; and managing work-life boundaries and receiving positive support from colleagues and managers helped to buffer perceived stress, work overload, and negative health outcomes. The practical implications of the results are discussed and suggestions made in the light of current research and stress theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/disa.12278

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empathic engagement leaves mental health workers at increased risk of empathy-based stress.

    “This empathic engagement predicts better client outcomes [22]; however, leaves MHWs at increased risk of EBS [19, 23].”

    From Interventions to address empathy-based stress in mental health workers: A scoping review and research agenda (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

    The High engagement and Discussion sections link humanitarian workers’ commitment to helping beneficiaries with over-engagement and a risk of stress. The Health outcomes section reports stress and burnout among employees. The paper does not specifically study mental health workers or identify empathy-based stress, so it supports only the broader engagement–stress connection. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Creswell, J.W., V.L.P. Clark, M.L. Gutmann, and W.E. Hanson (2003) 'Advanced mixed methods research designs'. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. pp. 209-240.
  2. Dragano, N., O. von dem Knesebeck, A. Rodel, and J. Siegrist (2003) 'Psychosocial work stress and musculo-skeletal disorders: significance for prevention'. Journal of Public Health. 11(3). pp. 196-207.
  3. Narayanan, L., S. Menon, and P. Spector (1999) 'A cross-cultural comparison of job stressors and reactions among employees holding comparable jobs in two countries'. International Journal of Stress Management. 6(3). pp. 197-212.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jachens, L., Houdmont, J., & Thomas, R.
Affiliations
  • Research Associate and Lecturer, Psychology, Sociology and Professional Counseling Faculty Webster University Switzerland
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Associate Professor, Psychology, Sociology and Professional Counseling Faculty Webster University Switzerland
Corresponding author
Jachens, Liza
Venue
Disasters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-13
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
619-634
ISSN
  • 0361-3666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7717
OpenAlex
W2626384383
Cited by
45
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disasters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
occupational stress, humanitarian workers, work overload, work-life boundaries, employee engagement, occupational health
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Relief Work, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review