Cited by 16Pain Management and Placebo EffectAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Placebo effects in children with autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Curie, Aurore, Oberlander, Tim F., Jensen, Karin B.·2023·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

Placebo responses are frequently observed in research studies and clinical contexts, yet there is limited knowledge about the placebo effect among children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we review the placebo effect in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Placebo responses are widely evident in ASD clinical trials and could partly operate via so-called placebo-by-proxy, whereby caregivers or clinicians indirectly shape patient outcomes. Understanding the role of placebo effects in ASD may help discern genuine treatment effects from contextual factors in clinical trials. The much less studied nocebo effect, or negative placebo, might contribute to the experience of side effects in ASD treatments but empirical data is missing. Better knowledge about placebo and nocebo mechanisms may contribute to the development of more effective research designs, such as three-armed designs that account for natural history, and improved treatments for ASD symptoms. At a clinical level, deeper knowledge about placebo and nocebo effects may optimize the delivery of care for individuals with ASD in the future. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Placebo responses are evident in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) clinical trials. Placebo responses in ASD are likely dependent on a placebo-by-proxy mechanism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dmcn.15574

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of randomization stopped us from being able to determine the degree to which reductions in depressive symptoms from this study were due to the CBT-DAY intervention as opposed to non-specific factors such as regression to the mean, expectancy effects, and spontaneous remission of depression over time.

    “The lack of randomization in particular stopped us from being able to determine the degree to which reductions in depressive symptoms from this study were due to the CBT-DAY intervention as opposed to non-specific factors such as regression to the mean, expectancy effects, and spontaneous remission of depression over time (see also Curie et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. humans. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 1996;8(2):194-­ 201.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curie, A., Oberlander, T. F., & Jensen, K. B.
Affiliations
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Karin B.
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-14
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
1316-1320
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W4324133283
Cited by
16
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
placebo effect, autism spectrum disorder, children, nocebo effect, clinical trials, treatment side effects, natural history (disease), neurodevelopmental disorders
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Humans, Placebo Effect, Nocebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review