Cited by 43Pain Management and Placebo EffectDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Placebo Responses in Genetically Determined Intellectual Disability: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Curie, Aurore, Yang, Kathy, Kirsch, Irving, Gollub, Randy L., des Portes, Vincent, Kaptchuk, Ted J., Jensen, Karin B.·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetically determined Intellectual Disability (ID) is an intractable condition that involves severe impairment of mental abilities such as learning, reasoning and predicting the future. As of today, little is known about the placebo response in patients with ID. OBJECTIVE: To determine if placebo response exists in patients with genetically determined ID. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We searched Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PsycINFO to find all placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with genetically determined ID, published up to April 2013, focusing on core ID symptoms. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators extracted outcome data independently. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Bias-corrected standardized mean difference (Hedge's g) was computed for each outcome measure, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. A priori defined patient sub-groups were analyzed using a mixed-effect model. The relationship between pre-defined continuous variable moderators (age, IQ, year of publication and trial duration) and effect size was analyzed using meta-regression. RESULTS: Twenty-two placebo-controlled double-blind RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n = 721, mean age = 17.1 years, 62% men, mean trial duration = 35 weeks). There was a significant overall placebo response from pre- to post-treatment in patients with ID (g = 0.468, p = 0.002), both for "subjective outcomes" (a third-person's evaluation of the patient) (g = 0.563, p = 0.022) and "objective outcomes" (direct evaluation of the patient's abilities) (g = 0.434, p = 0.036). Individuals with higher IQ had higher response to placebo (p = 0.02) and no placebo response was observed in ID patients with comorbid dementia. A significant effect of age (p = 0.02) was found, indicating higher placebo responses in treatment of younger patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results suggest that patients with genetically determined ID improve in the placebo arm of RCTs. Several mechanisms may contribute to placebo effects in ID, including expectancy, implicit learning and "placebo-by-proxy" induced by clinicians/family members. As the condition is refractory, there is little risk that improvements are explained by spontaneous remission. While new avenues for treatment of genetically determined ID are emerging, our results demonstrate how contextual factors can affect clinical outcomes and emphasize the importance of being vigilant on the role of placebos when testing novel treatments in ID.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0133316

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This placebo response is similar to the placebo response in adult patients without intellectual disability.

    “This is similar to the placebo response in adult patients without intellectual disability108.”
  • A meta-analysis of all placebo-controlled, double-blinded randomized controlled trials in patients with a genetic diagnosis of intellectual disability showed a placebo response with an effect size of 0.5, which is moderate.

    “A meta-analysis including all placebo-controlled, double-blinded RCTs conducted in patients with a genetic diagnosis of intellectual disability showed a placebo response with an effect size of 0.5 (moderate).”
  • Some studies employ a dilution method or do not follow manufacturer-recommended extraction of plasma samples before oxytocin assay, which may result in physiologically implausible levels of oxytocin, rendering conclusions about differences between groups, or associations with clinical measures, unverifiable.

    “For example, some studies employ a dilution method 24 or do not follow manufacturer-recommended extraction of plasma samples 25 before oxytocin assay.This may result in physiologically implausible levels of oxytocin, rendering conclusions about differences between groups, or associations with clinical measures, unverifiable.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curie, A., Yang, K., Kirsch, I., Gollub, R. L., des Portes, V., Kaptchuk, T. J., & Jensen, K. B.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Curie, Aurore
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
e0133316
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1725011155
Cited by
43
References
85
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K24AT004095, R01AT005280)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
placebo response, dementia comorbidity, expectancy, implicit learning, refractory disease
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Intellectual Disability, Placebo Effect, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review