Cited by 12Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Effects of self-monitoring of glucose on distress and self-efficacy in people with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Malanda, U. L., Bot, S. D. M., Kostense, P. J., Snoek, F. J., Dekker, J. M., Nijpels, G.·2016·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effects of self-monitoring of glucose in blood or urine, on diabetes-specific distress and self-efficacy, compared with usual care in people with non-insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one participants with non-insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes mellitus [diabetes duration ≥ 1 year, age 45-75 years, HbA1c ≥ 53.0 mmol/mol (7.0%), self-monitoring frequency < 3 times in the previous year] were randomly assigned to blood self-monitoring (n = 60), urine self-monitoring (n = 59) or usual care (n = 62). Primary outcomes were between-group differences in diabetes-specific distress [Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID)] and self-efficacy [Confidence in Diabetes Self-Care questionnaire (CIDS-2)] after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c , treatment satisfaction and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in changes in PAID and CIDS-2 after 12 months. Mean difference in PAID between blood monitoring and control was -2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) -7.1 to 2.7], between urine monitoring and control was -0.9 (95% CI -4.4 to 2.5) and between blood monitoring and urine monitoring was -2.0 (95% CI -4.1 to 0.1). Mean difference in CIDS-2 between blood monitoring and control was 0.6 [95% CI (-2.0 to 2.1), between urine monitoring and control was 2.8 (95% CI -2.3 to 7.9)] and between blood monitoring and urine monitoring was -3.3 (95% CI -7.9 to 1.3). No statistically significant between-group differences in change in any of the secondary outcome measures were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find statistical or clinical evidence for a long-term effect of self-monitoring of glucose in blood or urine on diabetes-specific distress and self-efficacy in people with moderately controlled non-insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes mellitus. (Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84568563).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.12849

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Association of Diabetes Educators. AADE7 self-care behaviors. Diabetes Educ 2008; 34: 445-449.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malanda, U. L., Bot, S. D. M., Kostense, P. J., Snoek, F. J., Dekker, J. M., & Nijpels, G.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Nijpels, G.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-18
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
537-546
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W1961119784
Cited by
12
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
self-monitoring of blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, non-insulin-treated diabetes, diabetes self-efficacy, glycemic control, HbA1c, treatment satisfaction, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Follow-Up Studies, Glycosuria, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review