Cited by 24Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Youth‐focused group mindfulness‐based intervention in individuals with early psychosis: A randomized pilot feasibility study

MacDougall, Arlene G., Price, Elizabeth, Vandermeer, Matthew R. J., Lloyd, Chantelle, Bird, Richelle, Sethi, Rickinder, Shanmugalingam, Aturan, Carr, Jason +2 more·2019·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: To assess the feasibility of a randomized pilot trial that evaluated the acceptability and potential clinical utility of the Mindfulness Ambassador Program (MAP), a unique, standardized 12‐session facilitated group mindfulness‐based intervention (MBI) for youth experiencing early psychosis. Methods: Twenty‐one patients of an early psychosis intervention program were randomized to receive MAP (n = 11) or treatment as usual (n = 10). Acceptability was measured by group attendance rate and client satisfaction; feasibility of the study design was measured by the recruitment and retention rate. The means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were described for outcomes of interest. Results: MAP is associated with a high degree of acceptability and has beneficial effects for depression and fatigue. The randomized trial design is feasible. Conclusions: This study provides important pilot data supporting a larger randomized trial of effectiveness for MAP as a group MBI for early psychosis. Details of MAP and study limitations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12753

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDougall, A. G., Price, E., Vandermeer, M. R. J., Lloyd, C., Bird, R., Sethi, R., Shanmugalingam, A., Carr, J., Anderson, K. K., & Norman, R. M. G.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
MacDougall, Arlene G.
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-15
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
993-998
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2896199268
Cited by
24
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (Opportunities Fund)
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (Internal Research Fund)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
early psychosis, youth, feasibility, acceptability, depression, fatigue, early intervention, recruitment and retention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Psychotic Disorders, Referral and Consultation, Single-Blind Method, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review