Cited by 19Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationDental Education, Practice, Research

Exploring the impact of digital professionalism awareness training on dental undergraduate students

Open access
Gormley, Mark, Collins, Laura, Schofield, Susie, Neville, Patricia·2021·European Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

Introduction: Since the publication of GDC guidance, there have been small, but rising numbers of Fitness to Practise (FtP) cases made against qualified dentists, relating to the use of social media. Prior to graduation, dental students currently receive training in the appropriate use of social media, but more work is needed to determine the most effective methods do this. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of the digital professionalism awareness training provided at one UK‐based institution. Materials and Methods: In year 2, a "brown envelope" is compiled using an online publicly available Facebook profile search for every student. All year 2 to 5 dental undergraduate students at one UK dental school who had completed the "brown envelope" were invited to participate in focus groups to examine its impact on behaviour change. A qualitative framework analysis method was applied to the transcripts. Results: Eleven dental undergraduate students participated in two focus groups. All students had experienced the "brown envelope" intervention. Four main themes emerged, including: a clear expression of dental student autonomy and rejection of regulation; that online activity in dentistry is different to medicine; that the intervention is useful and changed online behaviour; and constructive suggestions for improving training. Conclusion: The interactive "brown envelope" intervention for digital professionalism awareness training was well received and appeared to result in actionable behavioural change on student profiles (eg alterations in privacy settings or restricting access to their own "friends lists").

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eje.12601

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A UK study on dental undergraduate students found different expectations are placed on dental students regarding social media use compared to medical students because dentistry is a business.

    “The disproportion of medical and dental students’ orientation towards private sector is documenter in UK study on dental undergraduate students who expressed that different expectations are places on dental students regarding SM use compared to medical students given that dentistry is a business [25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(5):777-781.
  2. Ellaway RH, Coral J, Topps D, Topps M. Exploring digital profession- alism. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):844-849.
  3. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
  4. Jain A, Petty EM, Jaber RM, et al. 'What is appropriate to post on social media?' Ratings from students, faculty members and the pub- lic. Med Educ. 2014;48:157-169.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gormley, M., Collins, L., Schofield, S., & Neville, P.
Affiliations
  • University Of Bristol Dental Hospital (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Gormley, Mark
Venue
European Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-27
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
271-281
ISSN
  • 1396-5883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0579
OpenAlex
W3087133879
Cited by
19
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal Of Dental Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2016-25-011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
digital professionalism, social media use, dental students, professional conduct, fitness to practise, Facebook profiles, privacy settings, student independence, professional regulation
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Education, Dental, Humans, Students, Dental, Focus Groups, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review