Cited by 27Advanced Glycation End Products researchSkin Protection and AgingSkin Diseases and Diabetes

Advanced glycation end products in skin ageing and photoageing: What are the implications for epidermal function?

Farrar, Mark D.·2016·Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

Ageing is characterized by a gradual decline in the physiological function of cells and tissues of the body, with associated accumulation of damage. In human skin, the effects of chronological (intrinsic) ageing manifest as fine wrinkles, loss of elasticity and changes in pigmentation in later life. Compounding this is the impact of external factors, predominantly exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in sunlight, termed photoageing.1 A prominent feature of ageing at the molecular level is the gradual accumulation of proteins that have undergone non-enzymatic modification, one of the commonest of which is glycation. Reducing sugars react with free amino groups on proteins (and other molecules) leading to the reversible production of reactive intermediates and ultimately to irreversible advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Such modification can lead to reduced function.2 Long-lived proteins such as those of the dermal matrix are particularly vulnerable to modification, the result of which is tissue stiffening, reduced elasticity and potentially increased production of UVR-induced reactive oxygen species.3 AGE accumulation is countered by enzymes of the glyoxalase system, GLO-1 and GLO-2, which work in tandem to detoxify the reactive precursors of AGEs. There are yet few studies of AGEs and/or GLO enzymes in healthy human skin in vivo. A previous assessment of AGE abundance in human dermis showed the level of protein glycation to increase with age, with higher amounts in skin taken from photoexposed areas.4 Radjei et al.5 now provide further insight into AGEs in human skin with an investigation into the epidermal abundance and distribution of AGEs and GLO enzymes. They explored how these differ in young and aged skin, and the impact of chronic photoexposure. Localization of the most prevalent AGE modification, carboxymethyl-lysine (CML) and of GLO-1 and GLO-2 was investigated in skin from 10 young (25–30 years) and 10 aged (61–65 years) volunteers. Photoprotected (upper inner arm) skin was examined to assess how GLO production changes with chronological ageing. The two GLO enzymes showed different localization within the epidermis, with GLO-1 primarily associated with the proliferative basal layer and GLO-2 more prominent in the differentiated upper layers. This pattern was similar in young and aged skin, but both GLO-1 and GLO-2 were more abundant in aged skin. Interestingly, staining of CML-modified AGEs revealed lower amounts in the basal epidermal layer in older skin compared with younger skin. This led the authors to conclude that accumulation of AGEs through chronological ageing is associated with higher production of glyoxalase enzymes and hence lower amounts of AGEs. The authors went on to examine the impact of UVR exposure, finding that in young photoexposed (forearm) skin there was no difference in the amounts of GLO-1 or CML-modified protein from those detected in photoprotected skin. In older skin, there was a much greater accumulation of CML-modified protein in photoexposed skin but again, no difference in amount of GLO-1 compared to photoprotected skin. In both young and old skin, photoexposure was associated with lower production of GLO-2. The above in vivo immunohistochemical work was complemented in this study5 by a series of in vitro experiments in human keratinocytes to further examine the expression and production of GLO-1, and also its potential regulation by the transcription factor Nrf2, which upregulates expression of genes encoding antioxidant proteins and has been shown to regulate GLO-1 expression in mammalian cells including human fibroblasts in vitro.6 Although preliminary in nature, these data indicated that the GLO-1 enzyme is present and active in primary keratinocytes from young and aged donors, and that activation of Nrf2 gene expression in HaCaT keratinocytes was associated with increased expression of GLO-1. It is evident from this study and the few previous reports that chronic exposure to UVR in sunlight can promote AGE formation. However, the functional implications of AGE accumulation, particularly in the epidermis, are still unclear. The dermis contains long-lived proteins that are thus more susceptible to modification, but protein turnover in the epidermis is much more rapid and suprabasal layers undergo continual renewal such that modified proteins will eventually be lost as cells are replaced. Identifying which epidermal proteins most commonly undergo glycation and how long they persist may indicate potential impacts on function for further investigation. Further work is also required to elucidate the differential regulation of GLO-1 and GLO-2. The presence of the receptor for AGE (RAGE) on keratinocytes indicates that AGE-mediated activation may be possible with potentially negative consequences even over a short time period. A conveniently timed Letter in Experimental Dermatology by Iwamura et al.7 describes the distribution of RAGE protein in normal human sk

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/exd.13076

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glycation of long-lived proteins in dermal matrix and cytoskeleton results in tissue stiffening and reduced elasticity.

    “Long-lived proteins in the dermal matrix and cytoskeleton are particularly susceptible to glycation, resulting in tissue stiffening and reduced elasticity [77].”
  • AGEs accumulate in photo-aging skin, affect protein function in the dermis, and promote skin aging.

    “As the final product of nonenzymatic glycosylation reaction, AGEs accumulate in photo-aging skin, affect protein function in the dermis, and promote skin aging [48,49,50].”

    From Diet and Skin Aging—From the Perspective of Food Nutrition (2020) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrar, M. D.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Farrar, Mark D.
Venue
Experimental Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-20
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
947-948
ISSN
  • 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0625
OpenAlex
W2404082493
Cited by
27
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
Keywords
advanced glycation end products, skin aging, photoaging, glyoxalase system, glyoxalase I, carboxymethyllysine, epidermis, ultraviolet radiation, glycation, protein modification, skin elasticity, glyoxal
MeSH terms
Aging, Epidermis, Humans, Skin Aging, Glycation End Products, Advanced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review