Cited by 101Autophagy in Disease and TherapyPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationCellular transport and secretion

Rubicon: LC 3‐associated phagocytosis and beyond

Open access
Wong, Sing‐Wai, Sil, Payel, Martinez, Jennifer·2018·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

Rubicon (Rubcn) was initially identified as a component of the Class III PI3K complex and a negative regulator of canonical autophagy and endosomal trafficking. However, Rubicon has attracted the most notoriety because of its critical role in LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), a form of noncanonical autophagy that utilizes some components of the autophagy machinery to process extracellular cargo. Additionally, Rubicon has been identified as a key modulator of the inflammatory response and viral replication. In this review, we discuss the known functions of Rubicon in LAP and other signaling pathways and examine the disease pathologies associated with Rubicon dysfunction in animal models and humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/febs.14354

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rubicon appears to function in balancing classical autophagy and LAP, by committing a cell to LAP while inhibiting classical autophagy.

    “Thus, Rubicon appears to function in balancing classical autophagy and LAP, by committing a cell to LAP while inhibiting classical autophagy (Wong et al., 2018).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Wong et al., 2018

  • Rubicon-deficient macrophages undergo normal levels of phagocytic uptake yet fail to recruit LC3B-II to phagosomes.

    “Rubicon-deficient macrophages undergo normal levels of phagocytic uptake yet fail to recruit LC3B-II to phagosomes (Kim et al., 2013; Martinez et al., 2015; Wong et al., 2018).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Wong et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Matsunaga K, Saitoh T, Tabata K, Omori H, Satoh T, Kurotori N, Maejima I, Shirahama-Noda K, Ichimura T, Isobe T, Akira S, Noda T & Yoshimori T (2009) Two Beclin 1-binding proteins, Atg14L and Rubicon, reciprocally regulate autophagy at different stages, Nature cell biology. 11, 385– 96. 19270696
  2. [23]Zhong Y, Wang QJ, Li X, Yan Y, Backer JM, Chait BT, Heintz N & Yue Z (2009) Distinct regulation of autophagic activity by Atg14L and Rubicon associated with Beclin 1-phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase complex, Nature cell biology. 11, 468– 76. 19270693 PMC2664389
  3. [51]Bird TD (1993) Hereditary Ataxia Overview in GeneReviews(R) (Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean LJH, Bird TD, Ledbetter N, Mefford HC, Smith RJH & Stephens K, eds), Seattle (WA). 20301317
  4. [60]Martinez JM, R. K.; Lu Q; Cunha LD; Pelletier S; Gingras S; Orchard R; Guan JL; Tan H; Peng J; Kanneganti TD; Virgin HW, and Green DR (2015) Molecular characterization of LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) reveals distinct roles for Rubicon, NOX2, and autophagy proteins., Nature cell biology. PMC4612372 26098576

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, S., Sil, P., & Martinez, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Sing‐Wai
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-29
Volume
285
Issue
8
Pages
1379-1388
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W2773257251
Cited by
101
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Journal (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99-ES999999)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ZIAES103286)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
Rubicon, LC3-associated phagocytosis, non-canonical autophagy, class III PI3K, autophagy regulation, endosomal trafficking, inflammation, viral replication, disease pathology
MeSH terms
Autophagy-Related Proteins, Animals, Autophagy, Humans, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Models, Biological, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Endosomes, Signal Transduction, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review