Cited by 50Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Spage2vec: Unsupervised representation of localized spatial gene expression signatures

Open access
Partel, Gabriele, Wählby, Carolina·2021·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

Investigations of spatial cellular composition of tissue architectures revealed by multiplexed in situ RNA detection often rely on inaccurate cell segmentation or prior biological knowledge from complementary single‐cell sequencing experiments. Here, we present spage2vec, an unsupervised segmentation‐free approach for decrypting the spatial transcriptomic heterogeneity of complex tissues at subcellular resolution. Spage2vec represents the spatial transcriptomic landscape of tissue samples as a graph and leverages a powerful machine learning graph representation technique to create a lower dimensional representation of local spatial gene expression. We apply spage2vec to mouse brain data from three different in situ transcriptomic assays and to a spatial gene expression dataset consisting of hundreds of individual cells. We show that learned representations encode meaningful biological spatial information of re‐occurring localized gene expression signatures involved in cellular and subcellular processes. Database: Spatial gene expression data are available in Zenodo database at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3897401. Source code for reproducing analysis results and figures is available in Zenodo database at http://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4030404.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/febs.15572

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applying a joint GCN, VAE, and GAN framework to gene correlation networks initialized with a subset of gene expression matrices can generate disease networks with desired properties.

    “Further, applying a joint GCN, VAE, and GAN framework (Section 2.3) to gene correlation networks—initialized with a subset of gene expression matrices—can generate disease networks with the desired properties [149].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [149]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Maas AL, Hannun AY & Ng AY (2013) Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In Proc. icml 30, 3. http://robotics.stanford.edu/~amaas/papers/relu_hybrid_icml2013_final.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Partel, G., & Wählby, C.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Partel, Gabriele
  • Wählby, Carolina
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-11
Volume
288
Issue
6
Pages
1859-1870
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W3087998689
Cited by
50
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (682810)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
spatial transcriptomics, graph representation learning, unsupervised feature learning, graph neural networks, mouse brain, subcellular resolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Fibroblasts, Humans, Somatosensory Cortex, Cluster Analysis, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Internet, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, Transcriptome, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review