The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observing climate change trends in ocean biogeochemistry: when and where
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the influence of anthropogenic forcing on the marine biosphere is a high priority. Climate change‐driven trends need to be accurately assessed and detected in a timely manner. As part of the effort towards detection of long‐term trends, a network of ocean observatories and time series stations provide high quality data for a number of key parameters, such as pH, oxygen concentration or primary production (PP). Here, we use an ensemble of global coupled climate models to assess the temporal and spatial scales over which observations of eight biogeochemically relevant variables must be made to robustly detect a long‐term trend. We find that, as a global average, continuous time series are required for between 14 (pH) and 32 (PP) years to distinguish a climate change trend from natural variability. Regional differences are extensive, with low latitudes and the Arctic generally needing shorter time series (<~30 years) to detect trends than other areas. In addition, we quantify the ‘footprint’ of existing and planned time series stations, that is the area over which a station is representative of a broader region. Footprints are generally largest for pH and sea surface temperature, but nevertheless the existing network of observatories only represents 9–15% of the global ocean surface. Our results present a quantitative framework for assessing the adequacy of current and future ocean observing networks for detection and monitoring of climate change‐driven responses in the marine ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08823 · Cited by 6,467
Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity
Vaquer-Sunyer, R., & Duarte, C. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803833105 · Cited by 1,971
Warming up, turning sour, losing breath: ocean biogeochemistry under global change
Gruber, N. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0003 · Cited by 588
Extraction of a weak climatic signal by an ecosystem
Taylor, A. H., Allen, J. I., & Clark, P. A. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416629a · Cited by 196
Cited by
Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems
Henson, S. A., Beaulieu, C., Ilyina, T., John, J. G., Long, M., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., & Sarmiento, J. L. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14682 · Cited by 320
Self-citationReconstructing Global Chlorophyll-a Variations Using a Non-linear Statistical Approach
Martinez, E., Gorgues, T., Lengaigne, M., Sauzède, R., Menkes, C., Uitz, J., Di Lorenzo, E., & Fablet, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00464 · Cited by 43
Brady, R. X., Lovenduski, N. S., Alexander, M. A., Jacox, M., & Gruber, N. (2019) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-16-329-2019 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Henson, S. A., Beaulieu, C., & Lampitt, R.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1561-1571
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2226095791
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observing climate change trends in ocean biogeochemistry: when and where. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.13152
- The paper
- Henson, S. A., Beaulieu, C., & Lampitt, R. (2016). Observing climate change trends in ocean biogeochemistry: when and where. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.