The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Wound healing studies are intricate, mainly because of the multifaceted nature of the wound environment and the complexity of the healing process, which integrates a variety of cells and repair phases, including inflammation, proliferation, reepithelialization and remodelling. There are a variety of possible preclinical models, such as in mice, rabbits and pigs, which can be used to mimic acute or impaired for example, diabetic and nutrition‐related wounds. These can be induced by many different techniques, with excision or incision being the most common. After determining a suitable model for a study, investigators need to select appropriate and reproducible methods that will allow the monitoring of the wound progression over time. The assessment can be performed by non‐invasive protocols such as wound tracing, photographic documentation (including image analysis), biophysical techniques and/or by invasive protocols that will require wound biopsies. In this article, we provide an overview of some of the most often needed and used: (a) preclinical/animal models including incisional, excisional, burn and impaired wounds; (b) methods to evaluate the healing progression such as wound healing rate, wound analysis by image, biophysical assessment, histopathological, immunological and biochemical assays. The aim is to help researchers during the design and execution of their wound healing studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Chistiakov, D. A., Bobryshev, Y. V., Nikiforov, N. G., Elizova, N. V., Sobenin, I. A., & Orekhov, A. N. (2015) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.055 · Cited by 172
RetractedFactors affecting wound healing
Guo, S., & DiPietro, L. A. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359125 · Cited by 5,792
Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease
Shapouri‐Moghaddam, A., Mohammadian, S., Vazini, H., Taghadosi, M., Esmaeili, S., Mardani, F., Seifi, B., Mohammadi, A., Afshari, J. T., & Sahebkar, A. (2018) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.26429 · Cited by 4,930
Macrophage activation and polarization
Martinez, F. O. (2008) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/2692 · Cited by 3,160
Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot
Falanga, V. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67700-8 · Cited by 2,639
The Wound Healing Process: An Overview of the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms
Velnar, T., Bailey, T., & Smrkolj, V (2009) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/147323000903700531 · Cited by 2,442
Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling
Mantovani, A., Biswas, S. K., Galdiero, M. R., Sica, A., & Locati, M. (2013) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4133 · Cited by 2,384
Determination of hydroxyproline
Stegemann, H., & Stalder, K. (1967) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0009-8981(67)90167-2 · Cited by 1,570
Krzyszczyk, P., Schloss, R., Palmer, A., & Berthiaume, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00419 · Cited by 1,546
Pathophysiology of acute wound healing
Li, J., Chen, J., & Kirsner, R. (2007) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.007 · Cited by 1,486
Cited by
Innovative Treatment Strategies to Accelerate Wound Healing: Trajectory and Recent Advancements
Kolimi, P., Narala, S., Nyavanandi, D., Youssef, A. A. A., & Dudhipala, N. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11152439 · Cited by 585
Vascularization strategies in tissue engineering approaches for soft tissue repair
Masson‐Meyers, D. S., & Tayebi, L. (2021) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.3225 · Cited by 137
Self-citationHealing Effect of a Nano-Functionalized Medical-Grade Honey for the Treatment of Infected Wounds
Salvo, J., Sandoval, C., Schencke, C., Acevedo, F., & del Sol, M. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15092187 · Cited by 8
Fisseha, N., Hammeso, W. W., Nureye, D., Tesfaye, T., & Yimer, T. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.2147/jep.s387364 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Masson‐Meyers, D. S., Andrade, T. A. M., Caetano, G. F., Guimaraes, F. R., Leite, M. N., Leite, S. N., & Frade, M. A. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Experimental Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 21-37
- ISSN
- 0959-9673 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2613
- OpenAlex
- W3013379147
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 21.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/iep.12346
- The paper
- Masson‐Meyers, D. S., Andrade, T. A. M., Caetano, G. F., Guimaraes, F. R., Leite, M. N., Leite, S. N., & Frade, M. A. C. (2020). Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment. International Journal of Experimental Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/iep.12346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.