Consumer well‐being—A systematic literature review and research agenda using TCCM framework
Abstract
Consumer well‐being (CWB) refers to the cognitive and emotional reactions of consumers in response to their consumption experiences. It encompasses three elements: consumer satisfaction, positive emotions and perceived quality of life. In the past few years, there has been significant research growth in the field of CWB. However, a lack of effort is observed in reviewing this emerging and evolving field of research. This review utilises the Theory–Context–Construct–Methods (TCCM) framework given by Paul and Rosado‐Serrano (2019) ( International Marketing Review , 36 (6), 830–858), to delve into the prominent theories, contexts (i.e., countries and industries), characteristics (major factors and variables) and methods (i.e., research designs and analysis) used in CWB research spanning over the past 24 years (1998–2022). Through a systematic analysis and synthesis of 142 articles, an overview of this research field is provided, establishing a path for future agenda within the TCCM framework. This review reveals a prevalence of single‐theory approaches, with studies primarily focusing on theories such as the self‐determination theory and the attribution theory. Furthermore, CWB research demonstrates a stronger inclination towards examining the services industry context compared to other industries covered in the literature. Additionally, the review emphasises the need for further research on countries with emerging economies. Detailed future research directions are presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377 · see citing works
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495 · see citing works
The psychology of social impact
Latané, B. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.4.343 · Cited by 2,864 · see citing works
Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12695 · Cited by 2,364 · see citing works
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0521 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Five decades of research on foreign direct investment by MNEs: An overview and research agenda
Paul, J., & Feliciano-Cestero, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.017 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
International franchising: A literature review and research agenda
Rosado-Serrano, A., Paul, J., & Dikova, D. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Banker, S., & Khetani, S. (2019) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915619858057 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Pressed for Time? Goal Conflict Shapes how Time is Perceived, Spent, and Valued
Etkin, J., Evangelidis, I., & Aaker, J. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0130 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Pera, R., Quinton, S., & Baima, G. (2020) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21337 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Business sustainability measurement frameworks: a systematic literature review using a TCCM approach
Yasmin, F., Saleem, M., Khalid, A., Hafeez, M. H., & Ismail, H. (2025) · Journal of Trade Science · doi:10.1108/jts-04-2025-0018 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Grover, K., & Garima (2024) · International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing · doi:10.1007/s12208-024-00415-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhardwaj, P., & Kalro, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Bhardwaj, Priya
- Venue
- International Journal of Consumer Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-10-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-6431
- OpenAlex
- W4387379499
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Consumer Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
- Keywords
- consumer well-being, customer satisfaction, positive emotions, subjective quality of life, consumption experience, self-determination theory, attribution theory, service sector, emerging markets, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review