Cited by 91Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Frequent False‐positive results of lupus anticoagulant tests in plasmas of patients receiving the new oral anticoagulants and enoxaparin

Martinuzzo, M. E., Barrera, L. H., D 'Adamo, M. A., Otaso, J. C., Gimenez, M. I., Oyhamburu, J.·2014·International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

Abstract

Introduction Oral direct thrombin and Xa inhibitors are worldwide distributed for prevention and treatment of thrombosis. It is important to recognize their effects on lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. The aim of the study is to describe the rate of false-positive results of LA tests on plasmas of patients with previous negative LA tests results that receive dabigatran etexilate (DAB) 110 mg/twice a day, rivaroxaban (RIV) 10 mg/day or 15 mg/twice a day, or enoxaparin 40 mg/day. Methods Blood was taken between 1.5 and 4 h post administration. Tests evaluated are as follows: prothrombin time, APTT, dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) screen, APTT, and DRVVT mixing studies, index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) with normal plasma, screen/confirm normalized ratio (NR) for DRVVT and silica clotting time (SCT). Results Plasmas from patients taking DAB (n = 22) presented 100% prolonged APTT and DRVVT with ICA above the cutoff point and 81.8% positive screen/confirm NR, 100% prolonged SCT screen, but 4.5% positive confirmatory NR. All patients receiving RIV at 15 mg/twice a day (n = 4) presented positive DRVVT screen, mixing, and confirmatory tests, 75% and 100% prolonged APTT and SCT screen, with negative screen/confirm NR. Those taking RIV 10 mg/day (n = 22) showed 81.8% prolonged DRVVT screen, 82.3% and 76.5% of them with positive mixing and confirmatory studies. Patients receiving enoxaparin also presented high prevalence of APTT and DRVVT false-positive results. Conclusio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijlh.12138

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinuzzo, M. E., Barrera, L. H., D 'Adamo, M. A., Otaso, J. C., Gimenez, M. I., & Oyhamburu, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Grupo Bioquímico Laboratorio Central Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires CABA Argentina
Corresponding author
Martinuzzo, M. E.
Venue
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-06
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
144-150
ISSN
  • 1751-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-553X
OpenAlex
W1977286952
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, false positives, direct oral anticoagulants, dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, direct thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors, dilute Russell viper venom time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thromboprophylaxis
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, False Positive Reactions, Female, Hematologic Tests, Humans, Male, Reference Values, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Enoxaparin, Venous Thromboembolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review