The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A century of labour turnover research: A systematic literature review
Abstract
Labour turnover has been an important research topic in social science over the past century, involving disciplines such as human resource management, industrial relations, organizational behaviour, individual and organizational psychology, economics and health sciences. This paper presents a systematic literature review of voluntary labour turnover, providing an in‐depth analysis of 1375 labour turnover studies published up to July 2019 in 142 academic journals listed in the Chartered Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Guide 2018 . The analysis of theoretical and empirical labour turnover studies reveals: (1) distinctive foci in the development of labour turnover research over the past hundred years; (2) relative lack of attention to testing specific labour turnover theories; (3) a prevailing quantitative approach to identifying antecedents of labour turnover; (4) increased reliance on turnover intention as a proxy for actual turnover. This paper highlights these trends over time, providing insight into problematic areas from theoretical, methodological and empirical points of view. We suggest avenues for a more productive route to coherent theoretical, methodological and empirical development of labour turnover research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996
Research works printed but not linked: 158
- 10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.382 · DOI
- *Abrahamson E., 1997, The emergence and prevalence of employee management rhetorics: the effects of long waves, labor unions, and turnover, 1875 to 1992, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 491, 10.2307/257051 · DOI
- Allen D.G., 2004, Innovative Theory and Empirical Research on Employee Turnover, 35
- 10.5465/AMP.2010.51827775 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.1912 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.07.001 · DOI
- 10.2307/256705 · DOI
- Becker G., 1964, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education
- 10.1037/h0065881 · DOI
- Blau P.M., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life
- 10.1016/0007-6813(82)90097-0 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.882 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/10384111030412006 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.161 · DOI
- 10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Brissenden P.F., 1921, Causes of Labor Turnover
- Brissenden P.F., 1922, Labor Turnover in Industry: A Statistical Analysis
- 10.1108/JOEPP-12-2018-0114 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2013.0669 · DOI
- Cammann C., 1979, The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire
- 10.5465/amr.2010.0276 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.199 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-011-9223-8 · DOI
- 10.4337/9781784711153.00017 · DOI
- Chartered Association of Business Schools(2018)Academic Journal Guide 2018. Available athttps://charteredabs.org/academic‐journal‐guide‐2018‐view/[accessed 20 July 2019].
- *Chen G., 2011, The power of momentum: a new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 159
- 10.1080/095851998341233 · DOI
- 10.1108/00483480210430346 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00140.x · DOI
- Colvin F.H., 1919, Labor Turnover, Loyalty and Output
- 10.1177/0143831X11424768 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00123.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001872679905201006 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.716 · DOI
- 10.2307/257776 · DOI
- 10.2307/257256 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Denyer D., 2009, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, 671
- 10.2307/259187 · DOI
- 10.1177/000271621707100119 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.367 · DOI
- Eberly M.B., 2009, Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior, 123
- Emmet B., 1919, The Turnover of Labor
- 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90016-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb02479.x · DOI
- Fish E.H., 1922, Personnel and Labor Turnover
- Fishbein M., 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research
- 10.1177/000271621707100103 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872679204500502 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.322 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09585192.2019.1629985 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159578 · DOI
- 10.1111/1748-8583.12030 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781452231242 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920630002600305 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206311424943 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00004.x · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1110.0720 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206310383910 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0015898 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0032380 · DOI
- Holtom B.C., 2006, Integrating the unfolding model and job embeddedness to better understand voluntary turnover, Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 435
- 10.1002/hrm.20074 · DOI
- 10.5465/19416520802211552 · DOI
- Hom P.W., 2020, Employee Retention and Turnover. Why Employees stay or leave
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.350 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/apl0000103 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0027983 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0025655 · DOI
- *Huselid M.A., 1995, The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635, 10.2307/256741 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1984.4277940 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0028610 · DOI
- 10.1177/1059601119834407 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.644 · DOI
- 10.1111/1748-8583.12278 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0059770 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872679004300902 · DOI
- 10.1037/apl0000135 · DOI
- Kozlowski S.W.J., 2000, Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 3
- 10.1037/h0062274 · DOI
- 10.1080/09585190500521581 · DOI
- 10.2307/258835 · DOI
- *Lee T.W., 1999, The unfolding model of voluntary turnover: a replication and extension, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 450
- 10.1002/smj.196 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920630202800403 · DOI
- 10.1027/1866-5888/a000216 · DOI
- *Liu D., 2012, When employees are out of step with coworkers: how job satisfaction trajectory and dispersion influence individual‐ and unit‐level voluntary turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1360
- 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00282.x · DOI
- *Maertz C.P., 2004, Profiles in quitting: integrating process and content turnover theory, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 566, 10.2307/20159602 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jm.2004.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1366/000370258774615410 · DOI
- 10.2307/2391746 · DOI
- 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · DOI · Paper page
- *Mitchell T.R., 2001, Why people stay: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102, 10.2307/3069391 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23006-8 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237 · DOI
- Mobley W.H., 1982, Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control
- 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.408 · DOI
- Moliterno T.P., 2016, Research Methods for Strategic Management, 51
- 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00286.x · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-2370.00065 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1951.tb01471.x · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2005.17843941 · DOI
- 10.1016/0001-8791(80)90022-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/hrm.20167 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2011.0201 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2015.0323 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0030723 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360.2013.841651 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0034829 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0037335 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2338.1975.tb00822.x · DOI
- Price J.L., 1977, The Study of Turnover
- Price J.L., 1980, The International Yearbook of Organizational Studies 1979, 217
- 10.2307/255574 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-011-8016-0 · DOI
- Price J.L., 1986, Absenteeism and Turnover of Hospital Employees
- 10.4337/9781784711153.00016 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00257.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1548051817709007 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijmr.12245 · DOI
- 10.1111/peps.12226 · DOI
- 10.1086/671188 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44635525 · DOI
- *Sheridan J.E., 1983, Cusp catastrophe model of employee turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 26, 418, 10.2307/256254 · DOI
- 10.1111/peps.12039 · DOI
- Slichter S.H., 1919, The Turnover of Factory Labor
- 10.1037/h0072461 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2002.7389900 · DOI
- Steers R.M., 1981, Research in Organizational Behavior, 235
- 10.1037/a0024868 · DOI
- 10.1037/apl0000200 · DOI
- Tajfel H., 1986, Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7
- 10.1177/a010560 · DOI
- 10.1108/01443330710722724 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00369 · DOI
- Taylor F.W., 1911, The Principles of Scientific Management
- *Tett R.P., 1993, Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analysis based on meta‐analytic findings, Personnel Psychology, 46, 259, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ijmr.12277 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017013479827 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2008.31767250 · DOI
- 10.1177/0894845318771216 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872677102400304 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872679905201005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726708096637 · DOI
- 10.1111/1748-8583.12328 · DOI
- Vroom C.H., 1964, Work and Motivation
- 10.1002/cjas.111 · DOI
- 10.2307/257021 · DOI
- WEF, 2020, Jobs of Tomorrow. Mapping Opportunity in the New Economy
- 10.1177/109442819800100105 · DOI
- 10.1080/1367886042000201967 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-013-9303-z · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolt, E. E. T., Winterton, J., & Cafferkey, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 555-576
- ISSN
- 1460-8545
- 1468-2370
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.