Cited by 147Infection Control and VentilationInfluenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections research

Viable influenza A virus in airborne particles expelled during coughs versus exhalations

Open access
Lindsley, William G., Blachere, Francoise M., Beezhold, Donald H., Thewlis, Robert E., Noorbakhsh, Bahar, Othumpangat, Sreekumar, Goldsmith, William T., McMillen, Cynthia M. +3 more·2016·Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To prepare for a possible influenza pandemic, a better understanding of the potential for the airborne transmission of influenza from person to person is needed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to directly compare the generation of aerosol particles containing viable influenza virus during coughs and exhalations. METHODS: Sixty-one adult volunteer outpatients with influenza-like symptoms were asked to cough and exhale three times into a spirometer. Aerosol particles produced during coughing and exhalation were collected into liquid media using aerosol samplers. The samples were tested for the presence of viable influenza virus using a viral replication assay (VRA). RESULTS: Fifty-three test subjects tested positive for influenza A virus. Of these, 28 (53%) produced aerosol particles containing viable influenza A virus during coughing, and 22 (42%) produced aerosols with viable virus during exhalation. Thirteen subjects had both cough aerosol and exhalation aerosol samples that contained viable virus, 15 had positive cough aerosol samples but negative exhalation samples, and 9 had positive exhalation samples but negative cough samples. CONCLUSIONS: Viable influenza A virus was detected more often in cough aerosol particles than in exhalation aerosol particles, but the difference was not large. Because individuals breathe much more often than they cough, these results suggest that breathing may generate more airborne infectious material than coughing over time. However, both respiratory activities could be important in airborne influenza transmission. Our results are also consistent with the theory that much of the aerosol containing viable influenza originates deep in the lungs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/irv.12390

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]IOM: Preventing Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Diseases: Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel. Update 2010. Larson EL, Liverman CT (eds.): Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2011. 24983058
  2. [4]WHO: WHO Public Health Research Agenda for Influenza Biannual Progress Review and Report 2010–2011. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsley, W. G., Blachere, F. M., Beezhold, D. H., Thewlis, R. E., Noorbakhsh, B., Othumpangat, S., Goldsmith, W. T., McMillen, C. M., Andrew, M. E., Burrell, C. N., & Noti, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Health Effects Laboratory Division National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morgantown WV USA
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Lindsley, William G.
Venue
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-15
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
404-413
ISSN
  • 1750-2640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-2659
OpenAlex
W2300495613
Cited by
147
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
influenza A virus, airborne transmission, aerosol particles, cough, exhalation, respiratory droplets, virus viability, pandemic influenza preparedness, respiratory infections
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerosols, Air Microbiology, Cough, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Influenza A virus, RNA, Viral, Spirometry, Virus Replication, Exhalation, Microbial Viability, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review