Cited by 434Inhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryInfection Control and VentilationParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

The Mechanism of Breath Aerosol Formation

Open access
Johnson, Graham Richard, Morawska, Lidia·2009·Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aerosol production during normal breathing is often attributed to turbulence in the respiratory tract. That mechanism is not consistent with a high degree of asymmetry between aerosol production during inhalation and exhalation. The objective was to investigate production symmetry during breathing. METHODS: The aerosol size distribution in exhaled breath was examined for different breathing patterns including normal breathing, varied breath-holding periods, and contrasting inhalation and exhalation rates. The aerosol droplet size distribution measured in the exhaled breath was examined in real time using an aerodynamic particle sizer. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The dependence of the particle concentration decay rate on diameter during breath holding was consistent with gravitational settling in the alveolar spaces. Also, deep exhalation resulted in a four- to sixfold increase in concentration, and rapid inhalation produced a further two- to threefold increase in concentration. In contrast, rapid exhalation had little effect on the measured concentration. A positive correlation of the breath aerosol concentration with subject age was observed. The results were consistent with the breath aerosol being produced through fluid film rupture in the respiratory bronchioles in the early stages of inhalation and the resulting aerosol being drawn into the alveoli and held before exhalation. The observed asymmetry of production in the breathing cycle with very little aerosol being produced by exhalation is inconsistent with the widely assumed turbulence-induced aerosolization mechanism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jamp.2008.0720

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Normal physiological respiratory activities such as sneezing, coughing, talking and even breathing expel particles into the local environment.

    “The literature is replete with examples showing that normal physiological respiratory activities such as sneezing, coughing, talking and even breathing, expel particles into the local environment where individuals socialise and work [6–11].”

    From The protective performance of reusable cloth face masks, disposable procedure masks, KN95 masks and N95 respirators: Filtration and total inward leakage (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction states that normal breathing produces aerosol particles and compares their concentrations with those produced by coughing. The Methods describe collecting aerosol emitted by subjects, supporting release into the surrounding air. The paper does not address sneezing or talking, so it supports only part of the list of activities. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gebhart J, Anselm J, Heyder J, Stahlhofen W. The Human Lung as Aerosol Generator. Journal of Aerosol Medicine. 1988;1:196-7.
  2. Morawska L, Johnson GR, Ristovski ZD, Hargreaves M, Mengersen K, Corbett S, Chao CYH, Li Y, Katoshevski D. Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled during expiratory activities. Environmental Science and Technology. (In Press).
  3. Keck T, Leiacker R, Andreas H, Kuhnemann S, Rettinger G. Humidity and temperature profile in the nasal cavity. Rhinology. 2000;38:167-71.
  4. Dennis(Ed) R Handbook on Aerosols. University Press; 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, G. R., & Morawska, L.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Venue
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Published
2009-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
229-237
ISSN
  • 1941-2703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2711
OpenAlex
W1527782018
Cited by
434
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Science and Technology; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP0558410)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
aerosol formation mechanisms, aerosol size distribution, breath-holding, gravitational settling, respiratory bronchioles
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerosols, Age Factors, Inhalation, Gravitation, Humans, Middle Aged, Particle Size, Pulmonary Alveoli, Exhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review