CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 245Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NATURAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN WESTERN WOMEN: A TWIN STUDY

Kirk, Katherine M., Blomberg, Simon P., Duffy, David L., Heath, Andrew C., Owens, Ian P. F., Martin, Nick G.·2001·Evolution
DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01304.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Whether contemporary human populations are still evolving as a result of natural selection has been hotly debated. For natural selection to cause evolutionary change in a trait, variation in the trait must be correlated with fitness and be genetically heritable and there must be no genetic constraints to evolution. These conditions have rarely been tested in human populations. In this study, data from a large twin cohort were used to assess whether selection will cause a change among women in a contemporary Western population for three life-history traits: age at menarche, age at first reproduction, and age at menopause. We control for temporal variation in fecundity (the "baby boom" phenomenon) and differences between women in educational background and religious affiliation. University-educated women have 35% lower fitness than those with less than seven years education, and Roman Catholic women have about 20% higher fitness than those of other religions. Although these differences were significant, education and religion only accounted for 2% and 1% of variance in fitness, respectively. Using structural equation modeling, we reveal significant genetic influences for all three life-history traits, with heritability estimates of 0.50, 0.23, and 0.45, respectively. However, strong genetic covariation with reproductive fitness could only be demonstrated for age at first reproduction, with much weaker covariation for age at menopause and no significant covariation for age at menarche. Selection may, therefore, lead to the evolution of earlier age at first reproduction in this population. We also estimate substantial heritable variation in fitness itself, with approximately 39% of the variance attributable to additive genetic effects, the remainder consisting of unique environmental effects and small effects from education and religion. We discuss mechanisms that could be maintaining such a high heritability for fitness. Most likely is that selection is now acting on different traits from which it did in pre-industrial human populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01304.x

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2000, Australia now: a statistical profile
  2. Damon A., 1974, Hum. Biol., 46, 381
  3. Do K. A., 1998, Hum. Biol., 70, 1073
  4. Lenski R. E., 1982, Ecology, 63, 665
  5. Lewontin R. C., 1974, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26, 400
  6. Martin N. G., 1991, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 47, 137
  7. Math Works, 1993, MATLAB user's guide
  8. Neale M. C., 1998, Interaction and non-linear affects in structural equation modeling, 43
  9. Neale M. C., 1999, Mx: statistical modeling
  10. Stearns S. C., 1992, The evolution of life histories
  11. Treloar A. E., 1974, Hum. Biol., 46, 89
  12. Treloar S. A., 1990, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 47, 137

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 245

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kirk, K. M., Blomberg, S. P., Duffy, D. L., Heath, A. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Martin, N. G.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
ORCID
Venue
Evolution
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2001-02
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
423-435
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
DOI
10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01304.x
OpenAlex
W2168144246
Cited by
245
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 5325 d)
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA11998, R01AA007535, AA-07535, AA-07728)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
natural selection, human evolution, life-history traits, age at menarche, age at first reproduction, age at menopause, reproductive fitness, heritability, genetic covariance, twin studies, Western women
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Australia, Education, Female, Genetics, Population, Humans, Longevity, Menarche, Menopause, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Physical Fitness, Religion, Reproduction, Selection, Genetic, Twins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review