Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 884

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non‐medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey

Open access
McCabe, Sean Esteban, Knight, John R., Teter, Christian J., Wechsler, Henry·2005·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To examine the prevalence rates and correlates of non‐medical use of prescription stimulants (Ritalin, Dexedrine or Adderall) among US college students in terms of student and college characteristics. Design A self‐administered mail survey. Setting One hundred and nineteen nationally representative 4‐year colleges in the United States. Participants A representative sample of 10 904 randomly selected college students in 2001. Measurements Self‐reports of non‐medical use of prescription stimulants and other substance use behaviors. Findings The life‐time prevalence of non‐medical prescription stimulant use was 6.9%, past year prevalence was 4.1% and past month prevalence was 2.1%. Past year rates of non‐medical use ranged from zero to 25% at individual colleges. Multivariate regression analyses indicated non‐medical use was higher among college students who were male, white, members of fraternities and sororities and earned lower grade point averages. Rates were higher at colleges located in the north‐eastern region of the US and colleges with more competitive admission standards. Non‐medical prescription stimulant users were more likely to report use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, ecstasy, cocaine and other risky behaviors. Conclusions The findings of the present study provide evidence that non‐medical use of prescription stimulants is more prevalent among particular subgroups of US college students and types of colleges. The non‐medical use of prescription stimulants represents a high‐risk behavior that should be monitored further and intervention efforts are needed to curb this form of drug use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00944.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1080/07448480009596296 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1097/00004714-200212000-00020 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02914.x · DOI
  4. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04948.x · DOI
  5. 10.1542/peds.111.2.237 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.951116556.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1097/00004583-200202001-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Harrison L., 1997, The Validity of Self‐Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimate
  9. Jessor R., 1991, Beyond Adolescence: Problem Behavior and Young Adult Development
  10. Johnston L. D., 1985, Issues of validity and population coverage in student surveys of drug use, NIDA Research Monograph, 57, 31
  11. Johnston L. D., 2003, Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2002: II. College Students and Adults Ages 19–40.
  12. Johnston L. D., 2003, Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2002: I Secondary School Students.
  13. 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00464-6 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1359 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13548500220139386 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1520/JFS14440J · DOI
  17. 10.1081/JA-120038031 · DOI
  18. McCabe S. E., Medical use, illicit use and diversion of prescription stimulant medication, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
  19. 10.1080/07448480309595719 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1097/00004703-199806000-00006 · DOI
  21. 10.3109/10826088309033049 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.23 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Office of Applied Studies, 2002, Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: I. Summary of National Findings
  24. Office of Applied Studies, 2002, Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse:
  25. Office of Applied Studies, 2003, Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings
  26. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1071 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.11.1914 · DOI
  28. 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400040119027 · doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400040119027
  29. Popper C., 1999, Textbook of Psychiatry, 825
  30. 10.1177/000992289903800402 · DOI
  31. 10.2165/00023210-200216020-00005 · DOI
  32. 10.1542/peds.106.3.533 · DOI
  33. 10.1542/peds.98.6.1084 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.2105/AJPH.94.2.266 · DOI · Paper page
  35. StataCorp, 2001, Stata Statistical Software:
  36. 10.1037/e433812005-001 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/e433812005-001 · DOI
  38. 10.1592/phco.23.5.609.32210 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Teter C. J., Prevalence and motivations for the illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample, Journal of American College Health
  40. University of Florida, 2002, University of Florida Alcohol and Drug Survey Key Findings.
  41. 10.2105/AJPH.85.7.982 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1080/07448480009599305 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00003-6 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1001/archpedi.157.1.17 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 884

Metadata

Authors
McCabe, S. E., Knight, J. R., Teter, C. J., & Wechsler, H.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-10
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
96-106
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2146653011
Cited by
884
References
6
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00944.x
The paper
McCabe, S. E., Knight, J. R., Teter, C. J., & Wechsler, H. (2005). Non‐medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00944.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.