Cited by 365Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Assessing the abuse potential of methylphenidate in nonhuman and human subjects: a review

Kollins, Scott H, MacDonald, Emily K, Rush, Craig R·2001·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Methylphenidate (MPH) is widely used for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents, and adults. Methylphenidate is clearly effective for the treatment of ADHD, but there is controversy as to whether it has significant abuse potential like other psychostimulants (e.g., D-amphetamine and cocaine). In general, the drug is believed to be abused at rates much lower than those for other stimulants. The present review examines studies that investigated the behavioral pharmacological profile of methylphenidate and discusses how results from these studies address its abuse liability. Using MEDLINE search terms methylphenidate, drug discrimination, reinforcement, self-administration, subjective effects, subject-rated effects, abuse potential, and abuse liability, along with a review of the references from identified articles, 60 studies were located in which the reinforcing, discriminative-stimulus, or subjective effects of methylphenidate were directly assessed in nonhumans or humans. Forty-eight (80.0%) of the studies reviewed indicate that methylphenidate either functions in a manner similar to D-amphetamine or cocaine (e.g., functions as a reinforcer, substitutes fully in drug discrimination experiments), or produces a pattern of subjective effects suggestive of abuse potential. The results are discussed as they pertain to factors that may account for the apparent discrepancy in abuse rates between methylphenidate and other stimulants…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00464-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been reports of abuse and misuse of stimulant ADHD medication.

    “and there have been reports of abuse and misuse of stimulant ADHD medication (Kollins, MacDonald, & Rush, 2001; Wilens et al., 2008).”

    From Stimulant <scp>ADHD</scp> medication and risk for substance abuse (2014) · cites this paper as Kollins, MacDonald, & Rush, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kollins, S. H., MacDonald, E. K., & Rush, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Kollins, Scott H
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
611-627
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033200028
Cited by
365
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA010325, DA10325)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methylphenidate, abuse liability, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, psychostimulants, drug discrimination, self-administration, reinforcement, subjective effects, d-amphetamine, cocaine, pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Methylphenidate, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review