Cited by 45Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Mediators of a successful web‐based smokeless tobacco cessation program

Open access
Danaher, Brian G., Smolkowski, Keith, Seeley, John R., Severson, Herbert H.·2008·Addiction

Abstract

Aim To examine self‐efficacy and program exposure as possible mediators observed treatment effects for a web‐based tobacco cessation intervention. Design The ChewFree trial used a two‐arm design to compare tobacco abstinence at both the 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up for participants randomized to either an enhanced intervention condition or a basic information‐only control condition. Setting Internet in US and Canada. Participants Our secondary analyses focused upon 402 participants who visited the web‐based program at least once, whose baseline self‐efficacy rating showed room for improvement, who reported that they were still using tobacco at the 6‐week assessment, and for whom both 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up data were available. Intervention An enhanced web‐based behavioral smokeless tobacco cessation intervention delivered program content using text, interactive activities, testimonial videos and an ask‐an‐expert forum and a peer forum. The basic control condition delivered tobacco cessation content using static text only. Measurements Change in self‐efficacy and program exposure from baseline to 6 weeks were tested as simple and multiple mediators on the effect of treatment condition on point‐prevalence tobacco abstinence measured at 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up. Findings While both participant self‐efficacy and program exposure satisfied the requirements for simple mediation, only self‐efficacy emerged as a mediator when we used the more robust test of multiple mediation. Conclusions Results confirm the importance of self‐efficacy change as a probable underlying mechanism in a successful web‐based behavioral intervention. While program exposure was found to be a simple mediator of tobacco abstinence, it failed to emerge as a mediator when tested with self‐efficacy change in a multiple mediator test suggesting that self‐efficacy and program exposure share a complex, possibly reciprocal relationship with the tobacco abstinence outcome. Our results underscore the utility of searching for mediators in research on web‐based interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02295.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains plausible that reduced engagement with the iCanQuit app contributed, at least partially, to the diminished odds of quitting smoking among participants with two or more mental health disorders.

    “Considering that engagement with an app-based intervention is a strong predictor of smoking cessation [49, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89], it remains plausible that reduced engagement with the iCanQuit app contributed, at least partially, to the diminished odds of quitting smoking among participants with two or more mental health disorders.”

    From Can an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Smartphone App Help Individuals with Mental Health Disorders Quit Smoking? (2024) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Results (Simple mediation) and Conclusion report that program exposure was associated with abstinence in a web-based smokeless-tobacco cessation study. But exposure was not a significant mediator after accounting for self-efficacy (Results, Multiple mediation). The paper does not study cigarette smoking, the iCanQuit app, or participants with multiple mental health disorders, so it supports the general engagement premise only with those limits. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Severson HH Gordon JS Danaher BG Akers LA ChewFree.com: Evaluation of a Web-based cessation program for smokeless tobacco users Nicotine Tob.Res in press 18236303

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danaher, B. G., Smolkowski, K., Seeley, J. R., & Severson, H. H.
Affiliations
Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Danaher, Brian G.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-05
Volume
103
Issue
10
Pages
1706-1712
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2096394900
Cited by
45
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA 84225, R01CA084225)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
online intervention, self-efficacy, mediation analysis, smoking abstinence, tobacco use
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Canada, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Patient Compliance, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Tobacco, Smokeless, United States, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Tobacco Use Cessation, Self Efficacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review