Cited by 338Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Substance use disorder among older adults in the United States in 2020

Han, Beth, Gfroerer, Joseph C., Colliver, James D., Penne, Michael A.·2009·Addiction

Abstract

Aims This study aimed to project the number of people aged 50 years or older with substance use disorder (alcohol/illicit drug dependence or abuse) in the United States in 2020. Design Logistic regression models were applied to estimate parameters predicting past‐year substance use disorder using the 2002–06 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data. We applied these parameters to the projected US 2020 population to estimate the number of adults aged 50 or older with substance use disorder in 2020. Setting Non‐institutionalized US residences. Participants Representative sample of the US civilian, non‐institutionalized population. Measurements Substance use disorder is classified based on criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition. Findings Due to the large population size and high substance use rate of the baby‐boom cohort, the number of adults aged 50 or older with substance use disorder is projected to double from 2.8 million (annual average) in 2002–06 to 5.7 million in 2020. Increases are projected for all examined gender, race/ethnicity and age groups. Conclusions Our estimates provide critical information for policymakers to allocate resources and develop prevention and treatment approaches to address future needs of the US older adult population with substance use disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02411.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, B., Gfroerer, J. C., Colliver, J. D., & Penne, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Beth
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-12
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
88-96
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2023502391
Cited by
337
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
substance use disorders, older adults, population projections, alcoholism, illicit drug dependence, drug abuse, baby boom cohort, racial and ethnic disparities, gender differences, substance use prevalence, United States
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Forecasting, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, United States, Prevalence, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review