Cited by 131Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentGut microbiota and health

Bowel Habit Subtypes and Temporal Patterns in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review

Guilera, Magda, Balboa, Agustín, Mearin, Fermín·2005·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by the presence of abdominal discomfort or pain and bowel habit alterations: constipation (C-IBS), diarrhea (D-IBS), or alternating C and D (A-IBS). Its clinical course is poorly known. OBJECTIVES: (i) To compare bowel habit subtypes distribution in IBS according to sample origin and diagnosis criteria; (ii) To evaluate IBS temporal patterns based on follow-up studies. METHODS: A literature search (1966-2003) was conducted in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. A total of 72 studies were found and 22 were finally selected. RESULTS: Population-based studies from the United States (Manning) found similar distribution among C-IBS, D-IBS, and A-IBS, while European studies (Rome I, Rome II, or self-reporting) showed either C-IBS or A-IBS as the most prevalent subtypes. Primary care office-based studies (Rome I or Rome II) showed A-IBS as the most prevalent group. Gastroenterology specialized office-based studies found either C-IBS or D-IBS as the most frequently reported subtype. Prospective follow-up investigations showed that the most frequent IBS temporal pattern profile consists of mild to moderate symptoms appearing in cluster in an intermittent way, about once a week, and lasting 2-5 days on average. CONCLUSION: IBS clinical subtypes distribution differs depending on the population evaluated, the geographical location, and the criteria employed to define IBS and bowel habit subtypes. In most cases, clinical course is characterized by the presence of mild-to-moderate symptoms appearing sequentially. Prospective studies, using clear and stable diagnostic criteria and subtype definitions, and based on daily data collection should further characterize IBS clinical course.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40674.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guilera, M., Balboa, A., & Mearin, F.
Affiliations
Hospital Quirón Teknon (ES)
Corresponding author
Guilera, Magda
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2005-05
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
1174-1184
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2021290527
Cited by
131
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, clinical course, diagnostic criteria, Rome criteria, Manning criteria, symptom clustering
MeSH terms
Constipation, Defecation, Diarrhea, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intestines, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Abdominal Pain, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review