Cited by 65Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

The pharmacodynamic equivalence of levothyroxine and liothyronine: a randomized, double blind, cross‐over study in thyroidectomized patients

Open access
Celi, Francesco S., Zemskova, Marina, Linderman, Joyce D., Babar, Nabeel I., Skarulis, Monica C., Csako, Gyorgy, Wesley, Robert, Costello, Rene +2 more·2010·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

Summary: Context The substitution of liothyronine (L‐T3) for levothyroxine (L‐T4) is commonly employed during thyroid hormone (TH) withdrawal in preparation for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on thyroid cancer patients. Presently, only limited data are available on the L‐T3 for L‐T4 therapeutic substitution. Objective To characterize the pharmcodynamic equivalence of L‐T3 and L‐T4. Design Randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over intervention study. Setting NIH clinical center. Patients Ten thyroidectomized patients. Interventions Study participants were treated with L‐T3 or L‐T4 with a target TSH ≥ 0·5 ≤ 1·5 mU/l for at least 30 days before undergoing inpatient testing. Following testing, subjects crossed‐over according to the same scheme. Main outcome measures Area under the serum concentration–time curve of TSH from 0 to 60 min (AUC 0–60) and peak TSH serum concentration (Cmax) following thyrotropin‐releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation test, total L‐T4 and L‐T3 dose (mcg/kg), and L‐T4/L‐T3 ratio. Results No difference was observed for time 0 TSH values between L‐T3 and L‐T4 replacement phases (1·48 ± 0·77 vs. 1·21 ± 0·62 mU/l, P = 0·293) at average daily doses of 40·3 ± 11·3 mcg L‐T3 and 115·2 ± 38·5 mcg L‐T4, L‐T3: L‐T4 ratio 0·36 ± 0·06. TRH stimulation test resulted in similar L‐T3 vs. L‐T4 TSH responses with AUC 0–60 of 326·1 (95% CI 232·6–457·1) and 247·1 (95% CI 153·8–397·1) mU* min/l (P = 0·285); and Cmax of 6·83 (95% CI 4·88–9·55) and 5·23 (95% CI 3·31–8·3) mU/l (P = 0·383). Conclusions This is the first study addressing the equivalency between L‐T3 and L‐T4 therapy measured by baseline and TRH‐stimulated TSH. The therapeutic substitution of L‐T3 for L‐T4 was achieved at approximately 1:3 ratio.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03700.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LT3 monotherapy administered three times daily produces stable TSH levels with continued fluctuations in T3 levels, such that they reach the upper end of the normal range with each of the three dose administrations.

    “LT3 monotherapy administered three times daily produces stable TSH levels with continued fluctuations in T3 levels, such that they reach the upper end of the normal range with each of the three dose administrations (75,76).”

    From Evidence-Based Use of Levothyroxine/Liothyronine Combinations in Treating Hypothyroidism: A Consensus Document (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Results (Thyroid hormone levels; page unavailable) report similar 24-hour TSH profiles with LT3 and LT4, while T3 levels on LT3 were more variable. The Discussion says mean T3 remained within the normal range throughout 24 hours. Neither passage establishes that T3 reached the upper end of that range after each of the three doses. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some physicians replace part of the usual T4 dose by T3 at a substitution ratio of 3:1 (e.g., 25 μg of T4 replaced by 7.5 μg of T3).

    “Some physicians just replace part of the usual T4 dose by T3 at a substitution ratio of 3:1 (e.g., 25 μg of T4 is replaced by 7.5 μg of T3) [80].”

    From T4+T3 Combination Therapy: An Unsolved Problem of Increasing Magnitude and Complexity (2021) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Results and Discussion report an approximately 1:3 T3:T4 dose equivalence, and the Introduction describes combination therapy as common among practitioners. But the study tested T3 in place of T4, not physicians replacing part of a usual T4 dose at that ratio; it does not give the 25 μg-to-7.5 μg example. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Based on LT3 monotherapy studies, LT3 could be substituted for LT4 at a 1 to 3 ratio, such that 40 μg LT3 was equivalent to 115 μg LT4.

    “Based on these LT3 monotherapy studies, it was estimated that in terms of therapeutic equivalence, LT3 could be substituted for LT4 at a 1 to 3 ratio, such that 40 μg LT3 was equivalent to 115 μg LT4 (76).”
  • LT3 monotherapy administered three times daily is too frequent a dosing regimen for participants to easily adhere to.

    “Moreover, as judged by the length of time that it took over the course of the study to reach and maintain the goal TSH, it is too frequent a dosing regimen for participants to easily adhere to.”
  • A crossover design is appealing because of the increase in statistical power due to the ability to perform paired analyses.

    “A crossover design is appealing because of the increase in statistical power due to the ability to perform paired analyses, as has been performed in prior studies (23,46,50,52,58,59,75,76,107).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celi, F. S., Zemskova, M., Linderman, J. D., Babar, N. I., Skarulis, M. C., Csako, G., Wesley, R., Costello, R., Penzak, S. R., & Pucino, F.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
Corresponding author
Celi, Francesco S.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-25
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
709-715
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2135039498
Cited by
65
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Z01-DK047057-02, Z01DK047057)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
levothyroxine, liothyronine, thyroid hormone withdrawal, thyroidectomy, thyroid cancer, TRH stimulation test, TSH response, T3/T4 ratio, thyroid hormone replacement, crossover design, dose comparison, TSH receptor mutations
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Therapeutic Equivalency, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyroidectomy, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Triiodothyronine, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review