The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vulnerability of carbon storage in North American boreal forests to wildfires during the 21st century
Abstract
The boreal forest contains large reserves of carbon. Across this region, wildfires influence the temporal and spatial dynamics of carbon storage. In this study, we estimate fire emissions and changes in carbon storage for boreal North America over the 21st century. We use a gridded data set developed with a multivariate adaptive regression spline approach to determine how area burned varies each year with changing climatic and fuel moisture conditions. We apply the process‐based Terrestrial Ecosystem Model to evaluate the role of future fire on the carbon dynamics of boreal North America in the context of changing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2) concentration and climate in the A2 and B2 emissions scenarios of the CGCM2 global climate model. Relative to the last decade of the 20th century, decadal total carbon emissions from fire increase by 2.5–4.4 times by 2091–2100, depending on the climate scenario and assumptions about CO 2 fertilization. Larger fire emissions occur with warmer climates or if CO 2 fertilization is assumed to occur. Despite the increases in fire emissions, our simulations indicate that boreal North America will be a carbon sink over the 21st century if CO 2 fertilization is assumed to occur in the future. In contrast, simulations excluding CO 2 fertilization over the same period indicate that the region will change to a carbon source to the atmosphere, with the source being 2.1 times greater under the warmer A2 scenario than the B2 scenario. To improve estimates of wildfire on terrestrial carbon dynamics in boreal North America, future studies should incorporate the role of dynamic vegetation to represent more accurately post‐fire successional processes, incorporate fire severity parameters that change in time and space, account for human influences through increased fire suppression, and integrate the role of other disturbances and their interactions with future fire regime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems
Scholze, M., Knorr, W., Arnell, N. W., & Prentice, I. C. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601816103 · Cited by 756
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W. (2001) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00175.x · Cited by 684
A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector
Kurz, W. A., & Apps, M. J. (1999) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0526:ayraoc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 680
The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget
Harden, J. W., Trumbore, S. E., Stocks, B. J., Hirsch, A., Gower, S. T., O'neill, K. P., & Kasischke, E. S. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06019.x · Cited by 387
Simulating fire regimes in human-dominated ecosystems: Iberian Peninsula case study
Venevsky, S., Thonicke, K., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00528.x · Cited by 190 · cited 1×
“…of fire into process-based models, but the applications of these models have primarily been focused on retrospective analyses of carbon dynamics (Peng & Apps, 1999; Amiro et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2000, 2003; Thonicke et al., 2001; Venevsky et al., 2002; Hicke et al., 2003; Balshi et al., 2007).”
MethodCalef, M. P., McGuire, A. D., & Chapin, F. S. (2008) · Earth Interactions · doi:10.1175/2007ei220.1 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Cited by
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M. A., D’Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison, S. P., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1163886 · Cited by 3,351
Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change
McGuire, A. D., Anderson, L. G., Christensen, T. R., Dallimore, S., Guo, L., Hayes, D. J., Heimann, M., Lorenson, T. D., Macdonald, R. W., & Roulet, N. (2009) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/08-2025.1 · Cited by 984
Self-citationNatural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests
Thom, D., & Seidl, R. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12193 · Cited by 770
Continued warming could transform Greater Yellowstone fire regimes by mid-21st century
Westerling, A. L., Turner, M. G., Smithwick, E. A. H., Romme, W. H., & Ryan, M. G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1110199108 · Cited by 629
Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands
Turetsky, M. R., Kane, E. S., Harden, J. W., Ottmar, R. D., Manies, K. L., Hoy, E., & Kasischke, E. S. (2011) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1027 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- BALSHI, M. S., MCGUIRE, A. D., DUFFY, P., FLANNIGAN, M., KICKLIGHTER, D. W., & MELILLO, J.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1491-1510
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2158390242
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vulnerability of carbon storage in North American boreal forests to wildfires during the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01877.x
- The paper
- BALSHI, M. S., MCGUIRE, A. D., DUFFY, P., FLANNIGAN, M., KICKLIGHTER, D. W., & MELILLO, J. (2009). Vulnerability of carbon storage in North American boreal forests to wildfires during the 21st century. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01877.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.