The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sperm function tests and fertility
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Traditionally, the diagnosis of male infertility has depended upon a descriptive evaluation of human semen with emphasis on the number of spermatozoa that are present in the ejaculate, their motility and their morphology. The fundamental tenet underlying this approach is that male fertility can be defined by reference to a threshold concentration of motile, morphologically normal spermatozoa that must be exceeded in order to achieve conception. Many independent studies have demonstrated that this fundamental concept is flawed and, in reality, it is not so much the absolute number of spermatozoa that determines fertility, but their functional competence. In the light of this conclusion, a range of in vitro tests have been developed to monitor various aspects of sperm function including their potential for movement, cervical mucus penetration, capacitation, zona recognition, the acrosome reaction and sperm–oocyte fusion. Such functional assays have been found to predict the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa in vitro and in vivo with some accuracy. Recent developments in this field include the introduction of tests to assess the degree to which human spermatozoa have suffered oxidative stress as well as the integrity of their nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Such assessments not only yield information on the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa but also their ability to support normal embryonic development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVENSON, D. P., LARSON, K. L., & JOST, L. K. (2002) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x · Cited by 1,072
Aitken, R. J., Sutton, M., Warner, P., & Richardson, D. W. (1985) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0730441 · Cited by 218
Self-citationMortimer, D., Pandya, I. J., & Sawers, R. S. (1986) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0780093 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Gharagozloo, P., & Aitken, R. J. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der132 · Cited by 522
Self-citationCauses and consequences of oxidative stress in spermatozoa
Aitken, R. J., Gibb, Z., Baker, M. A., Drevet, J., & Gharagozloo, P. (2015) · Reproduction, Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd15325 · Cited by 428
Self-citationCarrell, D., Simon, L., Zini, A., Dyachenko, A., & Ciampi, A. (2017) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/1008-682x.182822 · Cited by 409
The impact of drugs on male fertility: a review
Semet, M., Paci, M., Saïas‐Magnan, J., Metzler‐Guillemain, C., Boissier, R., Lejeune, H., & Perrin, J. (2017) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12366 · Cited by 344
Wisniewski, P., Romano, R. M., Kizys, M. M. L., Oliveira, K. C., Kasamatsu, T., Giannocco, G., Chiamolera, M. I., Dias-da-Silva, M. R., & Romano, M. A. (2015) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.002 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Aitken, R. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-75
- ISSN
- 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2605
- OpenAlex
- W2048547956
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sperm function tests and fertility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00630.x
- The paper
- Aitken, R. J. (2006). Sperm function tests and fertility. International Journal of Andrology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.