The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial metabolism and health-related effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and other prebiotics
Abstract
Most studies involving prebiotic oligosaccharides have been carried out using inulin and its fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) derivatives, together with various forms of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS). Although many intestinal bacteria are able to grow on these carbohydrates, most investigations have demonstrated that the growth of bifidobacteria, and to a lesser degree lactobacilli, is particularly favoured. Because of their safety, stability, organoleptic properties, resistance to digestion in the upper bowel and fermentability in the colon, as well as their abilities to promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the gut, these prebiotics are being increasingly incorporated into the Western diet. Inulin-derived oligosaccharides and GOS are mildly laxative, but can result in flatulence and osmotic diarrhoea if taken in large amounts. However, their effects on large bowel habit are relatively minor. Although the literature dealing with the health significance of prebiotics is not as extensive as that concerning probiotics, considerable evidence has accrued showing that consumption of GOS and FOS can have significant health benefits, particularly in relation to their putative anti-cancer properties, influence on mineral absorption, lipid metabolism, and anti-inflammatory and other immune effects such as atopic disease. In many instances, prebiotics seem to be more effective when used as part of a synbiotic combination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Belenguer, A., Duncan, S. H., Calder, A. G., Holtrop, G., Louis, P., Lobley, G. E., & Flint, H. J. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.72.5.3593-3599.2006 · Cited by 856
Hopkins, M. J., Sharp, R., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2001) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.48.2.198 · Cited by 577
Self-citationLindsay, J. O. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.074971 · Cited by 471
Liévin, V, Peiffer, I., Hudault, S., Rochat, F., Brassart, D., Neeser, J.-R., & Servin, A. L. (2000) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.47.5.646 · Cited by 397
Brighenti, F., Casiraghi, M., Canzi, E., & Ferrari, A. (1999) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600841 · Cited by 204
Effects of prebiotics on the immune response to vaccination in the elderly
Bunout, D., Hirsch, S., de la Maza, M., Munoz, C., Haschke, F., Steenhout, P., Klassen, P., Barrera, G., Gattas, V, & Petermann, M. (2002) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607102026006372 · Cited by 107
Bittner, A. C., Croffut, R. M., & Stranahan, M. C. (2005) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.005 · Cited by 55
Cited by
Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health
Markowiak, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9091021 · Cited by 2,401
Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut
Flint, H. J., Scott, K. P., Duncan, S. H., Louis, P., & Forano, E. (2012) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.19897 · Cited by 2,331
Human milk oligosaccharides: Every baby needs a sugar mama
Bode, L. (2012) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cws074 · Cited by 1,809
Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases
Zhang, Y.-J., Li, S., Gan, R.-Y., Zhou, T., Xu, D.-P., & Li, H.-B. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16047493 · Cited by 1,055
“These prebiotics mostly target bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, which are two kinds of probiotics [44].”
BackgroundThe influence of diet on the gut microbiota
Scott, K. P., Gratz, S. W., Sheridan, P. O., Flint, H. J., & Duncan, S. H. (2013) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2012.10.020 · Cited by 1,052
Metadata
- Authors
- Macfarlane, G. T., Steed, H., & Macfarlane, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-04
- Volume
- 0
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 070907095856003-???
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2093829386
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 22.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.