Cited by 43Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Coffee consumption and risk of ischaemic heart disease — a settled issue?

GYNTELBERG, F., HEIN, H. O., SUADICANI, P., SØRENSEN, H.·1995·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract. Objective. Based on a meta‐analysis, it was recently stated that there is no association between coffee consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease. Why then, have studies on the issue shown quite variable results? Design, setting and subjects. A prospective study was performed in the Copenhagen Male Study on 2975 men (53–74 years) without cardiovascular disease at the baseline in 1985/1986. They were classified according to self‐reported consumption of filter coffee. Some 147 men (5%) were coffee abstainers. Potential confounders were alcohol use, physical activity, smoking, serum cotinine, serum lipids, serum selenium, body mass index, blood pressure, Lewis blood group, hypertension, non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus and social class. Main outcome measures. The incidence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) 1985/86–1991. Results. Some 184 men had a first IHD event. There was no significant difference between those consuming 1–4, 5–8 or ≥ 9 cups per day after controlling for confounders (P‐value of trend test: 0.14). The crude incidence rates were 6.8, 6.7 and 4.6%, respectively; the adjusted rates were 6.8, 6.7 and 4.0%, respectively. Coffee consumption was significantly (P < 0.05) inversely correlated with serum selenium concentration (never previously described) and, positively or negatively, with a number of other potential risk factors: smoking, alcohol use, serum triglycerides, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, social class, body mass index, and serum selenium. In nonsmokers and smokers of only a small amount of tobacco, coffee consumption was associated with a lower risk of IHD (P < 0.05). Conclusion. We conclude that the association between coffee consumption and risk of IHD is conditioned by known risk factors correlated with use of coffee, which may partly explain the inconsistencies in the results of previous studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb01140.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GYNTELBERG, F., HEIN, H. O., SUADICANI, P., & SØRENSEN, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
GYNTELBERG, F.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
237
Issue
1
Pages
55-61
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2020740474
Cited by
43
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, serum selenium, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum lipids, blood pressure, body mass index, social class
MeSH terms
Aged, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review