Cited by 61Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Coffee consumption and mortality from ischemic heart disease and other causes: results from the Lutheran Brotherhood study, 1966–1978

MURRAY, SAMUEL S., BJELKE, ERIK, GIBSON, ROBERT W., SCHUMAN, LEONARD M.·1981·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Murray, S. S., E. Bjeike, R. W. Gibson and L. M. Schuman (School of Public Health, U. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455). Coffee consumption and mortality from Ischemic heart disease and other causes: Results from the Lutheran Brotherhood study, 1966–1978. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 113: 661–7. In this cohort study, 16, 911 men who had completed a mailed dietary questionnaire were followed for 11 ½ years with 721 deaths reported from Ischemic heart disease (IHD) (excluding those reporting on the questionnaire a prior history of angina or other heart conditions). Although no association was found between coffee consumption and mortality from IHD, a negative association between coffee consumption and mortality from diseases other than IHD was found. This negative association, found exclusively in the first four years of follow-up, was observed in deaths from digestive diseases, other than malignancies, and paralysis agitans, which made the greatest contribution to this observed negative association. The negative association appeared to reflect a reduction in coffee consumption related to the disorders in question and not to a protective effect of coffee. It has been suggested that the positive association between coffee consumption and IHD reported in some case-control studies may reflect a decreased consumption among controls rather than an unusually high consumption among cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies (Murray et al., 1981; Stensvold and Tverdal, 1995) were not adjusted for any confounding variable.

    “Two studies (Murray et al., 1981;Stensvold and Tverdal, 1995) were not adjusted for any confounding variable.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 1981

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MURRAY, S. S., BJELKE, E., GIBSON, R. W., & SCHUMAN, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
SCHUMAN, LEONARD M.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1981-06
Volume
113
Issue
6
Pages
661-667
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2281650317
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, ischemic heart disease mortality, all-cause mortality, men, gastrointestinal diseases, Parkinson's disease, case-control bias
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review