Cited by 838Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesStress and Burnout Research

Nurse turnover: the mediating role of burnout

Open access
LEITER, MICHAEL P., MASLACH, CHRISTINA·2009·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: This study tested whether the mediation model of burnout could predict nurses' turnover intentions. BACKGROUND: A better understanding of what factors support a commitment to a nursing career could inform both policies and workplace practices. The mediation model of burnout provides a way of linking the quality of a nurse's worklife to various outcomes, such as turnover. METHOD: Data on areas of worklife, burnout, and turnover intentions were collected by surveying 667 Canadian nurses in the Atlantic Provinces. RESULTS: The findings supported the mediation model of burnout, in which areas of worklife predicted burnout, which in turn predicted turnover intentions. Cynicism was the key burnout dimension for turnover, and the most critical areas of worklife were value conflicts and inadequate rewards. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide some new insights into how the intention of nurses to leave their job is related to particular aspects of their worklife and to burnout. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: These results suggest what may be the most appropriate areas to target for interventions to reduce the risk of nurses exiting early from their chosen career.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01004.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cynicism is directly related to intention to leave.

    “one study found that Cynicism was directly related to intention to leave [35]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEITER, M. P., & MASLACH, C.
Affiliations
  • Acadia University (CA)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
331-339
ISSN
  • 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2834
OpenAlex
W1966282111
Cited by
838
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 32
FWCI
69.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Health Canada
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
nurse turnover, turnover intention, burnout, cynicism, value conflicts, nurse retention
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Data Collection, Environment, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Models, Psychological, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Personnel Turnover, Prince Edward Island, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Statistics as Topic, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review