Cited by 17Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOccupational Health and BurnoutPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on mental health in nurses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Kang, Mi-Jung, Myung, Seung-Kwon·2022·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Mindfulness as a positive mental health intervention approach has been increasingly applied to nurses. This meta-analysis evaluated the psychological effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on mental health in nurses. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL up to February 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of MBIs for nurses were included. Data extraction and the risk of bias assessment were conducted by two authors independently. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Of 370 studies retrieve from databases, nine RCTs, which involved 572 participants with 283 in an intervention group and 289 in a control group, were included in the final analysis. Compared to the control groups (no treatment, treatment as usual, or active control), MBIs reduced psychological distress such as anxiety, depression, or stress (SMD = −0.47; 95% CI, −0.67 to −0.32; I2 = 34.7; n = 17) in nurses. Also, MBIs slightly improved psychological wellbeing such as resilience, wellbeing, or quality of life (SMD = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.46; I2 = 0.00; n = 8). However, no statistically significant effects were found in Job related outcomes (SMD = 0.23; 95% CI, −0.01 to 0.47; I2 = 20.5; n = 6). This meta-analysis found that MBIs had beneficial effects on mental health such as psychological distress and wellbeing in nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840.2021.1949765

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our findings were consistent with related studies that mindfulness and acceptance and commitment therapy-based interventions are effective in reducing psychological distress and depression, as well as enhancing psychological flexibility and subjective psychological wellbeing among nurses.

    “Our findings were consistent with the findings of related studies that mindfulness and acceptance and commitment therapy-based interventions are effective in reducing psychological distress and depression, as well as enhancing psychological flexibility and subjective psychological wellbeing among nurses (37–39).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, M.-J., & Myung, S.-K.
Affiliations
  • Eulji University (KR)
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Myung, Seung-Kwon
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2021-07-22
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
51-59
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W3185139041
Cited by
17
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, nurses, mental health, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, stress, psychological well-being, resilience, quality of life, job-related outcomes
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Mental Health, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review