Cited by 50Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels between Middle Easterners and Swedes and between genders

DAWSON, A., LIST, T.·2009·Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the presence of culture and gender differences in pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels between Middle Easterners and Swedes. METHODS: Sixty-four healthy individuals, 32 Middle Easterners (16 men and 16 women, mean age: 24.6 +/- 3.4 years) and 32 Swedes (16 men and 16 women, mean age: 24 +/- 3.5 years) participated in the study. Three experimental pain tests were conducted in each participant. Pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels were measured using an algometer (mechanical stimulus), the PainMatcher((R)) (electric stimulus) and cold pressor test (thermal stimulus). RESULTS: While no significant differences in pain thresholds were observed between Middle Easterners and Swedes in algometer and cold pressor tests, differences in pain tolerance levels were significant (P < 0.01 for both tests). All between-culture differences in pain perception, pain threshold and pain tolerance level were non-significant when measured with the PainMatcher. Significant between-gender differences were observed only in pain threshold with the PainMatcher (P < 0.05) and in pain tolerance level with the algometer (P < 0.01) and the PainMatcher (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found significant differences in two out of three pain tolerance level tests - but not pain threshold tests - between the Middle Eastern and Swedish cultures and between genders. These differences were more pronounced between Middle Eastern and Swedish men than between Middle Eastern and Swedish women. Gender differences were more pronounced within the Swedish than the Middle Eastern culture. These findings indicate that culture and gender influence pain experience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01943.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zborowski M, 1969, People in pain

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DAWSON, A., & LIST, T.
Affiliations
Malmö University (SE)
Corresponding author
LIST, T.
Venue
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-03
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
271-278
ISSN
  • 0305-182X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2842
OpenAlex
W2026407101
Cited by
50
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
pain threshold, pain tolerance, gender differences in pain perception, Swedes, algometry, cold pressor test, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Cold Temperature, Cultural Characteristics, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle East, Pain Measurement, Pressure, Sex Factors, Sweden, Time Factors, Pain Threshold, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review