Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards an understanding of resilience and its relevance to medical training

Howe, Amanda, Smajdor, Anna, Stöckl, Andrea·2012·Medical Education

Abstract

Medical Education 2012: 46 : 349–356 Objectives This article explores the concept of resilience and its potential relevance to medicine. It also looks at the dimensions of resilience and its ethical importance for effective professional practice, and considers whether a focus on resilience might be useful in medical training. Methods An applied literature search was conducted across the domains of education, ethics, psychology and sociology to answer the research question: ‘What is resilience and what might it mean for professional development in medical education?’ This article predominantly considers the findings in relation to training in undergraduate and postgraduate settings, although the literature is wide‐ranging and findings may be applicable elsewhere. Results Resilience is a dynamic capability which can allow people to thrive on challenges given appropriate social and personal contexts. The dimensions of resilience (which include self‐efficacy, self‐control, ability to engage support and help, learning from difficulties, and persistence despite blocks to progress) are all recognised as qualities that are important in clinical leaders. Much of what is deemed good practice in modern pedagogical approaches to medical training may support the development of resilience in adulthood, but this concept has rarely been used as a goal of professional development. More research is needed on the ways in which resilience can be recognised, developed and supported during and after clinical training. Conclusions Resilience is a useful and interesting construct which should be further explored in medical education practice and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04188.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. General Medical Council, 2010, Good Medical Practice
  2. Cyrulnik B, 2009, Resilience
  3. 10.1080/02640411003734085 · doi:10.1080/02640411003734085
  4. 10.1332/policypress/9781861349507.003.0008 · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781861349507.003.0008
  5. HaithME.Strengthening the warrior spirit: linking the development of the warrior spirit to soldier resilience. Fort Leavenworth Ethics Symposium 1618 November 2009 Fort Leavenworth KS.http://www.leavenworthethicssymposium.org/resource/resmgr/2009_other_papers/warriorspirit‐soldierresilie.pdf.[Accessed 24 November 2011.]
  6. JohnsonRJ.Developing moral resilience amidst moral complexity. Fort Leavenworth Ethics Symposium 1517 November 2010 Fort Leavenworth KS.http://www.leavenworthethicssymposium.org/resource/resmgr/2010_General_Papers/Johnson.pdf. [Accessed 24 November 2011.]
  7. Warnock GL, 2008, Reflecting on principles of professionalism, 51, 84
  8. 10.1136/jme.26.2.131 · doi:10.1136/jme.26.2.131

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Howe, A., Smajdor, A., & Stöckl, A.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
349-356
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2122088523
Cited by
441
References
43
FWCI
19.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards an understanding of resilience and its relevance to medical training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04188.x
The paper
Howe, A., Smajdor, A., & Stöckl, A. (2012). Towards an understanding of resilience and its relevance to medical training. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04188.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.